5.

Pairs on Truths

1.

The Description Section

Synopsis

1. Four truths - the truth of suffering, the truth of origin, the truth of cessation, the truth of the path.

1.

The Section on Term Clarification

Conformity

2. Is suffering the truth of suffering?

Is the truth of suffering suffering?

Is origin the truth of origin?

Is the truth of origin origin?

Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Is the truth of cessation cessation?

Is the path the truth of the path?

Is the truth of the path the path?

Opposite

3. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not the truth of suffering not suffering?

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?

Is what is not the truth of origin not origin?

Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not the truth of cessation not cessation?

Is what is not path not the truth of the path?

Is what is not the truth of the path not path?

2.

The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel

Conformity

4. Is suffering the truth of suffering?

Is truth the truth of origin?

Is suffering the truth of suffering?

Is truth the truth of cessation?

Is suffering the truth of suffering?

Is truth the truth of the path?

Is origin the truth of origin?

Is truth the truth of suffering?

Is origin the truth of origin?

Is truth the truth of cessation?

Is origin the truth of origin?

Is truth the truth of the path?

Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Is truth the truth of suffering?

Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Is truth the truth of origin?

Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Is truth the truth of the path?

Is the path the truth of the path?

Is truth the truth of suffering?

Is the path the truth of the path?

Is truth the truth of origin?

Is the path the truth of the path?

Is truth the truth of cessation?

Opposite

5. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?

Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?

Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?

Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?

Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?

Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?

Is what is not path not the truth of the path?

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?

Is what is not path not the truth of the path?

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?

Is what is not path not the truth of the path?

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?

3.

The Pure Truth Section

Conformity

6. Is suffering truth?

Is truth suffering?

Is origin truth?

Is truth origin?

Is cessation truth?

Is truth cessation?

Is path truth?

Is truth path?

Opposite

7. Is what is not suffering not truth?

Is what is not truth not suffering?

Is what is not origin not truth?

Is what is not truth not origin?

Is what is not cessation not truth?

Is what is not truth not cessation?

Is what is not path not truth?

Is what is not truth not path?

4.

The Pure Truth Root Wheel Section

Conformity

8. Is suffering truth?

Is truth origin?

Is suffering truth?

Is truth cessation?

Is suffering truth?

Is truth path?

Is origin truth?

Is truth suffering? Etc. Is truth path?

Is cessation truth?

Is truth suffering? Etc. Is truth path?

Is path truth?

Is truth suffering?

Is path truth?

Is truth origin?

Is path truth?

Is truth cessation?

Opposite

9. Is what is not suffering not truth?

Is what is not truth not origin?

Is what is not suffering not truth?

Is what is not truth not cessation?

Is what is not suffering not truth?

Is what is not truth not path?

Is what is not origin not truth?

Is what is not truth not suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not path?

Is what is not cessation not truth?

Is what is not truth not suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not path?

Is what is not path not truth?

Is what is not truth not suffering?

Is what is not path not truth?

Is what is not truth not origin?

Is what is not path not truth?

Is what is not truth not cessation?

The Section on Synopsis of Description.

1.

The Description Section

Exposition

1.

The Section on Term Clarification

Conformity

10. Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is the truth of suffering suffering?

Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remaining truth of suffering is not suffering. Bodily pain and mental pain are both suffering and the truth of suffering.

Is origin the truth of origin?

Setting aside the truth of origin, the remaining origin is not the truth of origin. The truth of origin is both origin and the truth of origin.

Is the truth of origin origin? Yes.

Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remaining cessation is not the truth of cessation. The truth of cessation is both cessation and the truth of cessation.

Is the truth of cessation cessation? Yes.

Is path the truth of the path?

Setting aside the truth of the path, the remaining path is not the truth of the path. The truth of the path is both path and the truth of the path.

Is the truth of the path path? Yes.

Opposite

11. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.

Is what is not the truth of suffering not suffering? Yes.

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.

Is what is not the truth of origin not origin?

Setting aside the truth of origin, the remainder is not the truth of origin, but is origin. Setting aside origin and the truth of origin, the remainder is neither origin nor the truth of origin.

Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation? Yes.

Is what is not the truth of cessation not cessation?

Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remainder is not the truth of cessation, but is cessation. Setting aside cessation and the truth of cessation, the remainder is neither cessation nor the truth of cessation.

Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.

Is what is not the truth of the path not path?

Setting aside the truth of the path, the remainder is not the truth of the path, but is path. Setting aside path and the truth of the path, the remainder is neither path nor the truth of the path.

2.

The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel

Conformity

12. Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is truth the truth of origin?

The truth of origin is both truth and the truth of origin. The remaining truths are not the truth of origin.

Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?

The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.

13. Is origin the truth of origin?

Setting aside the truth of origin, the remaining origin is not the truth of origin. The truth of origin is both origin and the truth of origin. Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?

The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.

14. Is cessation the truth of cessation?

Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remaining cessation is not the truth of cessation. The truth of cessation is both cessation and the truth of cessation.

Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?

The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.

15. Is path the truth of the path?

Setting aside the truth of the path, the remaining path is not the truth of the path. The truth of the path is both path and the truth of the path.

Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation?

The truth of cessation is both truth and the truth of cessation. The remaining truths are not the truth of cessation.

Opposite

16. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes.

Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?

Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.

17. Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.

18. Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation? Yes.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.

19. Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Yes.

3.

The Pure Truth Section

Conformity

20. Is suffering truth? Yes.

Is truth the truth of suffering?

The truth of suffering is both truth and the truth of suffering. The remaining truths are not the truth of suffering.

Is origin truth? Yes. Etc.

Is cessation truth? Yes. Etc.

Is path truth? Yes.

Is truth the truth of the path?

The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.

Opposite

21. Is what is not suffering not truth?

Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is what is not origin not truth?

Setting aside origin, etc. Setting aside cessation, etc.

Is what is not path not truth?

Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.

4.

The Pure Truth Root Wheel Section

Conformity

22. Is suffering truth? Yes.

Is truth the truth of origin?

The truth of origin is both truth and the truth of origin. The remaining truths are not the truth of origin.

Is suffering truth? Yes.

Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?

The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.

Is origin truth? Yes. Etc.

Is cessation truth? Yes. Etc.

Is path truth? Yes.

Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation?

The truth of cessation is both truth and the truth of cessation. The remaining truths are not the truth of cessation.

Opposite

23. Is what is not suffering not truth?

Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes.

Is what is not suffering not truth?

Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.

24. Is what is not origin not truth?

Setting aside origin, the remaining truths are not origin, but are truths. Setting aside origin and truth, the remainder is neither origin nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Etc.

25. Is what is not cessation not truth?

Setting aside cessation, etc.

26. Is what is not path not truth?

Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.

Is what is not path not truth?

Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.

Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes. Etc.

Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Yes.

The Section on Analytic Explanation of Description.

2.

The Section on Occurrence 1.

The Section on Arising

(1) The Section on the Present

Conformity Person

27. For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path does not arise for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the moment of arising of the path, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arises.

Or else, for whom the truth of path arises, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of path arises, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the moment of arising of the path, for them both the truth of path arises and the truth of suffering arises.

28. For whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path arise for that one? No.

Or else, for whom the truth of path arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one? No.

Conformity Place

29. Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise there?

In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not arise there. In the four-aggregate constituent realm and in the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises.

Or else, etc.? Yes.

Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path arise there?

In the realm of misery and in the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path does not arise there. In the remaining four-aggregate constituent realm and five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arises.

Or else, where the truth of path arises, does the truth of suffering arise there? Yes.

30. Where the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path arise there?

In the realm of misery, there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path does not arise there. In the remaining four-aggregate constituent realm and five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arises.

Or else, etc.? Yes.

Conformity - Person - Place

31. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one there? Etc.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, should be expanded).

Negative Person

32. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one?

In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

33. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

34. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise there? There is not.

Or else, where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises.

Where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise there? There is not.

Or else, where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises.

35. Where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise there? Yes.

Or else, where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise there?

In the realm of misery, there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise there. In the non-percipient being realm, there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.

Negative - Person - Place

36. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one there?

In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

37. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the path, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them there. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them there. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.

(2) The Section on the Past

Conformity Person

38. For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin arise for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin arose, did the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of path arise for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path arose.

Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.

39. For whom the truth of origin arose, did the truth of path arise for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path arose.

Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.

Conformity Place

40. Where the truth of suffering arose... etc.

(The 'where' section also everywhere is similar. The difference in the text is similar to the 'where' section below).

Conformity - Person - Place

41. For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin arose.

Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.

For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of path arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.

42. For whom and where the truth of origin arose, did the truth of path arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second unwholesome consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.

Negative Person

43. For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one? There is not.

Or else, etc. had not arisen? There is not.

For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.

44. For whom the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one? There is not.

Or else, etc. had not arisen? It had arisen.

The Negative Section on Place

45. Where the truth of suffering had not arisen... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

46. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of suffering had not not arisen for them there. For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of suffering had not arisen.

For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering had not not arisen for them there. For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering had not arisen.

47. For whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second unwholesome consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin had not arisen.

(3) The Section on the Future

Conformity Person

48. For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, etc. Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, etc. will arise? Yes.

49. For whom the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin will arise.

Conformity Place

50. Where the truth of suffering will arise... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

51. For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise... etc. will arise? Yes.

For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, will the truth of suffering arise for that one there? Yes.

52. For whom and where the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin will arise.

Negative Person

53. For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.

54. For whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?

Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

55. Where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

56. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.

For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.

57. For whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.

(4) The Section on Present and Past

Conformity Person

58. For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin arise for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of path arise for that one? For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom the truth of path arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path arose and the truth of suffering arises.

59. For whom the truth of origin arises, did the truth of path arise for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom the truth of path arose, does the truth of origin arise for that one?

For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of path arose, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path arose and the truth of origin arises.

Conformity Place

60. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc. (all similar cases apply here).

Conformity - Person - Place

61. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arose.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of path arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path arose and the truth of suffering arises.

62. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, did the truth of path arise for that one there?

For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arose.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path arose, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path arose, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path arose and the truth of origin arises.

Negative Person

63. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one?

It had arisen.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one? There is not.

For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one?

For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them. For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.

64. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one?

For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin does not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

65. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.

Negative - Person - Place

66. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin had not arisen.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.

67. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin does not arise.

(5) The Section on Present and Future

Conformity Person

68. For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arises.

69. For whom the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path arise for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, does the truth of origin arise for that one?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arises.

Conformity Place

70. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc. (The 'where' section also should be done similar to the 'for whom and where' section).

Conformity - Person - Place

71. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arises.

72. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arises.

Negative Person

73. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

74. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

75. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.

Negative - Person - Place

76. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.

77. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?

For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin does not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.

(6) The Section on Past and Future

Conformity Person

78. For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of path arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, etc. Yes.

79. For whom the truth of origin arose, will the truth of path arise for that one? For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, etc. Yes.

Conformity Place

80. Where the truth of suffering arose... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

81. For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering did not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arose.

For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering did not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arose.

82. For whom and where the truth of origin arose, will the truth of path arise for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arose.

Negative Person

83. For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of origin not arise for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.

For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.

84. For whom the truth of origin had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one? It had arisen.

The Negative Section on Place

85. Where the truth of suffering had not arisen... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

86. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there? It will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there? It had arisen.

For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one there? It will arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there? It had arisen.

87. For whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of path will not arise.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin had not not arisen for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin had not arisen.

The Section on Arising.

2.

Occurrence 2.

The Section on Cessation

(1) The Section on the Present

Conformity Person

88. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of origin cease for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin ceases.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of suffering cease for that one? Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of path cease for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path does not cease for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path ceases.

Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?

In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of path ceases, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them both the truth of path ceases and the truth of suffering ceases.

89. For whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.

Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of origin cease for that one? No.

Conformity Place

90. Where the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of origin cease there?

In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering ceases... etc.

(The 'where' section in arising, in cessation, in arising-cessation is similar; there is no difference).

Conformity - Person - Place

91. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.

(The 'for whom and where' section is similar, should be expanded).

Negative Person

92. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, does the truth of path not cease for that one?

In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path does not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for them the truth of path does not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

93. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path does not cease for them. For all at the moment of arising of consciousness, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path does not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. For all at the moment of arising of consciousness, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.

The Negative Section on Place

94. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

95. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, in the 'for whom and where' section also 'those attained to cessation' - this should not be done).

(2) The Section on the Past

Conformity Person

96. For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.

(As the past questions in the arising section have been analysed both in conformity and in reverse, so they should be analysed in the cessation section also; there is no difference.)

(3) The Section on the Future

Conformity Person

97. For whom the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

98. For whom the truth of origin will cease, will the truth of path cease for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin will cease.

Conformity Place

99. Where the truth of suffering will cease... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

100. For whom and where the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of origin will cease. Etc.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).

Negative Person

101. For whom the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.

For whom the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.

102. For whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?

Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.

The Negative Section on Place

103. Where the truth of suffering will not cease... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

104. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.

For whom and where the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there? Yes.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.

105. For whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.

(4) The Section on Present and Past

Conformity Person

106. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, had the truth of origin ceased for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.

For whom the truth of suffering ceases, had the truth of path ceased for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path had ceased.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?

For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.

107. For whom the truth of origin ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path had ceased.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of origin cease for that one?

For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of origin ceases.

Conformity Place

108. Where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

109. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, did the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For the others, for those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin had ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.

For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path had ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.

110. For whom and where the truth of origin ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one there?

For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path had ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of origin ceases.

Negative Person

111. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one? It had ceased.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one? There is not.

For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one?

For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.

112. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one?

For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.

Or else, for whom the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?

For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of origin does not cease.

The Negative Section on Place

113. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

114. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin had not ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.

115. For whom and where the truth of origin does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one there?

For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of origin does not cease.

(5) The Section on Present and Future

Conformity Person

116. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.

For whom the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.

117. For whom the truth of origin ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin ceases.

Conformity Place

118. Where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

119. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, for those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.

For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.

120. For whom and where the truth of origin ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin ceases.

Negative Person

121. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

122. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.

The Negative Section on Place

123. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

124. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.

125. For whom and where the truth of origin does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.

(6) The Section on Past and Future

Conformity Person

126. For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

127. For whom the truth of origin had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

Conformity Place

128. Where the truth of suffering had ceased... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

129. For whom and where the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, did the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering did not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering had ceased.

For whom and where the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, did the truth of suffering cease for that one there?

For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering did not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering had ceased.

130. For whom and where the truth of origin had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, did the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin had ceased.

Negative Person

131. For whom the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one? It had ceased.

For whom the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one? It had ceased.

132. For whom the truth of origin had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one? There is not.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, had the truth of origin not ceased for that one? It had ceased.

The Negative Section on Place

133. Where the truth of suffering had not ceased... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

134. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there? It will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one there? It had ceased.

For whom and where the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one there? It will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one there? It had ceased.

135. For whom and where the truth of origin had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of origin had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin had not ceased and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin had not ceased.

The Section on Cessation.

2.

Occurrence 3.

The Section on Arising and Cessation

(1) The Section on the Present

Conformity Person

136. For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease for that one? No.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? No.

For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.

Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? No.

137. For whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.

Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of origin arise for that one? No.

Conformity Place

138. Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease there?

In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not cease there. Etc.

(The 'where' section in the arising section, in the cessation section, in the arising-cessation section is similar; there is no difference).

Conformity - Person - Place

139. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease for that one there? No.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).

Negative Person

140. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin does cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin does not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path does not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

141. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path does not cease, but the truth of origin does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

142. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.

Negative - Person - Place

143. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise... etc.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, in the 'for whom and where' section also 'those attained to cessation' - this should not be done).

(2) The Section on the Past

Conformity Person

144. For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, etc. Yes.

(The past questions as analysed in the arising section, so in the arising-cessation section also should be analysed both in conformity and in reverse.)

(3) The Section on the Future

Conformity Person

145. For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, etc. Yes.

146. For whom the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path cease for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, will the truth of origin arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin will arise.

Conformity Place

147. Where the truth of suffering will arise... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

148. For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there... etc. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there... etc. (The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).

Negative Person

149. For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not arise.

150. For whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?

Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

151. Where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.

Negative - Person - Place

152. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.

(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar; the truth of origin and the truth of path are different: at the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not arise).

(4) The Section on Present and Past

Conformity Person

153. For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.

Or else, etc.

(The present-past questions in the arising section also, in the arising-cessation section also, for 'for whom' also, for 'where' also, for 'for whom and where' also, in conformity also, in reverse also, are similar; they should be analysed by one without confusion).

(5) The Section on Present and Future

Conformity Person

154. For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering arises.

155. For whom the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path cease for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin arises.

Conformity Place

156. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc.

Conformity - Person - Place

157. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering etc. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there the truth of suffering etc.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering arises.

For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering arises.

158. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path cease for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin arises.

Negative Person

159. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?

For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?

At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

160. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?

For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.

The Negative Section on Place

161. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.

Negative - Person - Place

162. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?

For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?

At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.

163. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?

At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.

Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?

For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin does not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.

(6) The Section on Past and Future

Conformity Person

164. For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin cease for that one?

(As the past-future questions in the cessation section have been analysed both in conformity and in reverse, so in the arising-cessation section also they should be analysed by one without confusion).

The Section on Arising and Cessation.

The Section on Occurrence is concluded.

3.

The Section on Full Understanding

1.

The Section on Present

165. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, does he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever abandons the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? Yes.

Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, does he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.

2.

The Section on Past

166. Whoever fully understood the truth of suffering, did he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.

Whoever did not fully understand the truth of suffering, did he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.

3.

The Section on Future

167. Whoever will fully understand the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.

Whoever will not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.

Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.

4.

The Section on Present and Past

168. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, did he abandon the truth of origin? No.

Or else, whoever abandoned the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.

Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, did he not abandon the truth of origin?

A Worthy One does not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that he did not abandon the truth of origin. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons do not fully understand the truth of suffering and did not abandon the truth of origin.

Or else, whoever did not abandon the truth of origin, does he not fully understand the truth of suffering?

The possessor of the highest path did not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he does not fully understand the truth of suffering. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons did not abandon the truth of origin and do not fully understand the truth of suffering.

5.

The Section on Present and Future

169. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? No.

Or else, whoever will abandon the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.

Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin?

Those who will obtain the path, they do not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that they will not abandon the truth of origin. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they do not fully understand the truth of suffering and will not abandon the truth of origin.

Or else, whoever will not abandon the truth of origin, does he not fully understand the truth of suffering?

The possessor of the highest path will not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he does not fully understand the truth of suffering. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not abandon the truth of origin and do not fully understand the truth of suffering.

6.

The Section on Past and Future

170. Whoever fully understood the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? No.

Or else, whoever will abandon the truth of origin, did he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.

Whoever did not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin?

Those who will obtain the path, they did not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that they will not abandon the truth of origin. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they did not fully understand the truth of suffering and will not abandon the truth of origin.

Or else, whoever will not abandon the truth of origin, did he not fully understand the truth of suffering?

A Worthy One will not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he did not fully understand the truth of suffering. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not abandon the truth of origin and did not fully understand the truth of suffering.

The Section on Full Understanding.

The Pairs on Truths is concluded.