Loading...

Paliverse

100%
Font family
Theme
Navigation & Search

Hello ,How can i help you ?

Tikaṇḍakīsuttaṃ [AN 5.144, PTS 3.170]

4.

The Discourse on Tikaṇḍakī

144.More DetailsCommentaries On one occasion the Blessed One was dwelling at Sāketa in the Tikaṇḍakī Grove. There the Blessed One addressed the monks thus: "Monks." "Venerable sir," those monks assented to the Blessed One. The Blessed One said this:

"Good, monks, a monk should from time to time dwell perceiving the repulsive in the non-repulsive. Good, monks, a monk should from time to time dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in the repulsive. Good, monks, a monk should from time to time dwell perceiving the repulsive in both the non-repulsive and the repulsive. Good, monks, a monk should from time to time dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in both the repulsive and the non-repulsive. Good, monks, a monk should from time to time, having avoided both the repulsive and the non-repulsive, dwell equanimous, mindful and fully aware.

"And what, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the repulsive in the non-repulsive? 'May lust not arise in me towards enticing mental states' - this, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the repulsive in the non-repulsive.

"And what, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in the repulsive? 'May hate not arise in me towards mental states based on hate' - this, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in the repulsive.

"And what, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the repulsive in both the non-repulsive and the repulsive? 'May lust not arise in me towards enticing mental states, may hate not arise in me towards mental states based on hate' - this, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the repulsive in both the non-repulsive and the repulsive.

"And what, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in both the repulsive and the non-repulsive? 'May hate not arise in me towards mental states based on hate, may lust not arise in me towards enticing mental states' - this, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk should dwell perceiving the non-repulsive in both the repulsive and the non-repulsive.

"And what, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk, having avoided both the repulsive and the non-repulsive, should dwell equanimous? 'Mindful and fully aware, may lust not arise in me anywhere, in any place, in any way towards enticing mental states; may hate not arise in me anywhere, in any place, in any way towards mental states based on hate; may delusion not arise in me anywhere, in any place, in any way towards mental states leading to infatuation' - this, monks, is the reason dependent on which a monk, having avoided both the repulsive and the non-repulsive, should dwell equanimous, mindful and fully aware." The fourth.

×

Error: Contact form not found.

×

Add notes for personal use

↑