Homage to the Blessed One, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Enlightened One
Canon of the Higher Teaching
Yamaka Pāḷi (First Part)
1.
Pairs on Roots
Synopsis
1.
Root Section
1.
Wholesome Mental States
(1) Root Method
1. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them wholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome?
2. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
3. Whatever mental states are of one root with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
(2) Root-Root Method
4. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them roots of wholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are roots of wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome?
5. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
6. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
(3) Possessing-Root Method
7. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them rooted in the wholesome?
Or else, whatever are rooted in the wholesome, are all those mental states wholesome?
8. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
9. Whatever mental states are of one root with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
10. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them rooted in wholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are rooted in wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome?
11. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root rooted in a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
12. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
2.
Unwholesome Mental States (1) Root Method
13. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them unwholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
14. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
15. Whatever mental states are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
(2) Root-Root Method
16. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them roots of unwholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are roots of unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
17. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
18. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
(3) Possessing-Root Method
19. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them having unwholesome roots?
Or else, whatever have unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
20. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
21. Whatever mental states are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
22. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them rooted in unwholesome roots?
Or else, whatever are rooted in unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
23. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root rooted in an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
24. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
3.
Indeterminate Mental States (1) Root Method
25. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them indeterminate roots?
Or else, whatever are indeterminate roots, are all those mental states indeterminate?
26. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
27. Whatever mental states are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
(2) Root-Root Method
28. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them roots of indeterminate roots?
Or else, whatever are roots of indeterminate roots, are all those mental states indeterminate?
29. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
30. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
(3) Possessing-Root Method
31. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them having indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever have indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
32. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
33. Whatever mental states are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
34. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them having indeterminate root as root?
Or else, whatever have indeterminate root as root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
35. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root rooted in an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
36. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate?
4.
Mental Phenomena (1) Root Method
37. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
38. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
39. Whatever mental states are of one root with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
(2) Root-Root Method
40. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality root root?
Or else, whatever are mentality root root, are all those mental states mental?
41. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
42. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
(3) Possessing-Root Method
43. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
44. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are of one root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
45. Whatever mental states are of one root with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
46. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them having mentality root as root?
Or else, whatever have mentality root as root, are all those mental states mental?
47. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root rooted in a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
48. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
The Synopsis of the Root Section.
2-10.
Cause Section and so on
49. Whatever mental states are wholesome, all of them have a wholesome root... etc. have a wholesome source... etc. have a wholesome origin... etc. have a wholesome production... etc. have a wholesome origination... etc. have a wholesome nutriment... etc. have a wholesome object... etc. have a wholesome condition... etc. have a wholesome arising... etc.
Origination, nutriment, object, condition, and with arising.
The Section on Synopsis is concluded.
Exposition
1.
Root Section
1.
Wholesome mental states (1) the root method
50. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them wholesome roots? There are only three wholesome roots. The remaining wholesome mental states are not wholesome roots.
Or else, whatever are wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
51. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root with a wholesome root? Yes.
Or else, whatever are of one root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root with a wholesome root, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both of one root with a wholesome root and wholesome.
52. Whatever mental states are of one root with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the wholesome roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a wholesome root are of one root with a wholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
(2) Root-Root Method
53. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them roots of wholesome roots? There are only three roots of wholesome roots. The remaining wholesome mental states are not roots of wholesome roots.
Or else, whatever are roots of wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
54. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root-root with a wholesome root? Yes.
Or else, whatever are of one root-root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root-root with a wholesome root, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both of one root-root with a wholesome root and wholesome.
55. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the wholesome roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a wholesome root are of one root rooted with a wholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
(3) Possessing-Root Method
56. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them rooted in the wholesome? Yes.
Or else, whatever are rooted in the wholesome, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is rooted in the wholesome, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both rooted in the wholesome and wholesome.
57. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root with a wholesome root? Yes.
Or else, whatever are of one root with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root with a wholesome root, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both of one root with a wholesome root and wholesome.
58. Whatever mental states are of one root with a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the wholesome roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a wholesome root are of one root with a wholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
59. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them rooted in wholesome roots? Yes.
Or else, whatever are rooted in wholesome roots, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is rooted in wholesome roots, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both rooted in wholesome roots and wholesome.
60. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them of one root rooted in a wholesome root? Yes.
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome?
Wholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root rooted in a wholesome root, but is not wholesome. The wholesome is both of one root rooted in a wholesome root and wholesome.
61. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in a wholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with a wholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the wholesome roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a wholesome root are of one root rooted in a wholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a wholesome root, are all those mental states wholesome? Yes.
2.
Unwholesome Mental States (1) Root Method
62. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them unwholesome roots?
There are only three unwholesome roots. The remaining unwholesome mental states are not unwholesome roots.
Or else, whatever are unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
63. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root with an unwholesome root?
Rootless unwholesome is not of one root with an unwholesome root. Unwholesome with root is of one root with an unwholesome root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root with an unwholesome root, but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome is both of one root with an unwholesome root and unwholesome.
64. Whatever mental states are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the unwholesome roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an unwholesome root are of one root with an unwholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
(2) Root-Root Method
65. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them roots of unwholesome roots?
There are only three roots of unwholesome roots. The remaining unwholesome mental states are not roots of unwholesome roots.
Or else, whatever are roots of unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
66. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root-root with an unwholesome root?
Rootless unwholesome is not of one root-root with an unwholesome root. Unwholesome with root is of one root-root with an unwholesome root.
Or else, whatever are of one root-root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root-root with an unwholesome root, but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome is both of one root-root with an unwholesome root and unwholesome.
67. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the unwholesome roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an unwholesome root are of one root rooted with an unwholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
(3) Possessing-Root Method
68. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them having unwholesome roots?
Rootless unwholesome is not having unwholesome roots. Unwholesome with root is having unwholesome roots.
Or else, whatever have unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality has unwholesome roots but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome both has unwholesome roots and is unwholesome.
69. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root with an unwholesome root?
Rootless unwholesome is not of one root with an unwholesome root. Unwholesome with root is of one root with an unwholesome root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root with an unwholesome root, but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome is both of one root with an unwholesome root and unwholesome.
70. Whatever mental states are of one root with an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the unwholesome roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an unwholesome root are of one root with an unwholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
71. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them rooted in unwholesome roots?
Rootless unwholesome is not rooted in unwholesome roots. Unwholesome with root is rooted in unwholesome roots.
Or else, whatever are rooted in unwholesome roots, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality is rooted in unwholesome roots but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome is both rooted in unwholesome roots and unwholesome.
72. Whatever mental states are unwholesome, are all of them of one root rooted in an unwholesome root?
Rootless unwholesome is not of one root rooted in an unwholesome root. Unwholesome with root is of one root rooted in an unwholesome root.
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome?
Unwholesome (mind)-originated materiality is of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, but is not unwholesome. The unwholesome is both of one root rooted in an unwholesome root and unwholesome.
73. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, are all of them mutually rooted with an unwholesome root?
The roots which arise together, the unwholesome roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an unwholesome root are of one root rooted in an unwholesome root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an unwholesome root, are all those mental states unwholesome? Yes.
3.
Indeterminate Mental States (1) Root Method
74. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them indeterminate roots?
Only three are indeterminate roots. The remaining indeterminate mental states are not indeterminate roots.
Or else, whatever are indeterminate roots, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
75. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root with an indeterminate root?
Rootless indeterminate is not of one root with an indeterminate root. Indeterminate with root is of one root with an indeterminate root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
76. Whatever mental states are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
The roots which arise together, the indeterminate roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an indeterminate root are of one root with an indeterminate root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
(2) Root-Root Method
77. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them roots of indeterminate roots?
Only three are roots of indeterminate roots. The remaining indeterminate mental states are not roots of indeterminate roots.
Or else, whatever are roots of indeterminate roots, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
78. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root-root with an indeterminate root?
Rootless indeterminate is not of one root-root with an indeterminate root. Indeterminate with root is of one root-root with an indeterminate root.
Or else, whatever are of one root-root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
79. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
The roots which arise together, the indeterminate roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an indeterminate root are of one root rooted with an indeterminate root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
(3) Possessing-Root Method
80. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them having indeterminate root?
Rootless indeterminate is not having indeterminate root. Indeterminate with root is having indeterminate root.
Or else, whatever have indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
81. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root with an indeterminate root?
Rootless indeterminate is not of one root with an indeterminate root. Indeterminate with root is of one root with an indeterminate root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
82. Whatever mental states are of one root with an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
The roots which arise together, the indeterminate roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an indeterminate root are of one root with an indeterminate root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
83. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them having indeterminate root as root?
Rootless indeterminate is not having indeterminate root as root. Indeterminate with root is having indeterminate root as root.
Or else, whatever have indeterminate root as root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
84. Whatever mental states are indeterminate, are all of them of one root rooted in an indeterminate root?
Rootless indeterminate is not of one root rooted in an indeterminate root. Indeterminate with root is of one root rooted in an indeterminate root.
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
85. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in an indeterminate root, are all of them mutually rooted with an indeterminate root?
The roots which arise together, the indeterminate roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with an indeterminate root are of one root rooted in an indeterminate root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with an indeterminate root, are all those mental states indeterminate? Yes.
4.
Mental Phenomena (1) Root Method
86. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality root?
There are only nine mentality roots. The remaining mental states are not mentality root.
Or else, whatever are mentality root, are all those mental states mental? Yes.
87. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root with a mentality root?
Rootless mentality is not of one root with a mentality root. Mentality with root is of one root with a mentality root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality is of one root with a mentality root, but is not mental. Mentality is both of one root with a mentality root and mental.
88. Whatever mental states are of one root with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
The roots which arise together, the mentality roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a mentality root are of one root with a mentality root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental? Yes.
(2) Root-Root Method
89. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality root root?
Only nine are mentality root root. The remaining mental states are not mentality root root.
Or else, whatever are mentality root root, are all those mental states mental? Yes.
90. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root-root with a mentality root?
Rootless mentality is not of one root-root with a mentality root. Mentality with root is of one root-root with a mentality root.
Or else, whatever are of one root-root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality is of one root-root with a mentality root, but is not mental. Mentality is both of one root-root with a mentality root and mental.
91. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
The roots which arise together, the mentality roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a mentality root are of one root rooted with a mentality root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental? Yes.
(3) Possessing-Root Method
92. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them mentality rooted?
Rootless mentality is not mentality rooted. Mentality with root is mentality rooted.
Or else, whatever are mentality rooted, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality is mentality rooted, but is not mental. Mentality is both mentality rooted and mental.
93. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root with a mentality root?
Rootless mentality is not of one root with a mentality root. Mentality with root is of one root with a mentality root.
Or else, whatever are of one root with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality is of one root with a mentality root, but is not mental. Mentality is both of one root with a mentality root and mental.
94. Whatever mental states are of one root with a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
The roots which arise together, the mentality roots, are both of one root and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a mentality root are of one root with a mentality root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental? Yes.
(4) Root-Possessing-Root Method
95. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them having mentality root as root?
Rootless mentality does not have mentality root as root. Mentality with root has mentality root as root.
Or else, whatever have mentality root as root, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality has mentality root as root, but is not mental. Mentality both has mentality root as root and is mental.
96. Whatever mental states are mental, are all of them of one root rooted in a mentality root?
Rootless mentality is not of one root rooted in a mentality root. Mentality with root is of one root rooted in a mentality root.
Or else, whatever are of one root rooted in a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
Mentality-originated materiality is of one root rooted in a mentality root, but is not mental. Mentality is both of one root rooted in a mentality root and mental.
97. Whatever mental states are of one root rooted in a mentality root, are all of them mutually rooted with a mentality root?
The roots which arise together, the mentality roots, are both of one root rooted and mutually rooted. The remaining mental states connascent with a mentality root are of one root rooted in a mentality root, but not mutually rooted.
Or else, whatever are mutually rooted with a mentality root, are all those mental states mental?
Yes.
The Analytic Explanation of the Root Section.
2-10.
Cause Section and so on
98. Whatever mental states are wholesome, are all of them wholesome roots?
Only three are wholesome roots, the remaining wholesome mental states are not wholesome roots... etc. have a wholesome source... have a wholesome origin... have a wholesome production... have a wholesome origination... have a wholesome nutriment... have a wholesome object... have a wholesome condition... have a wholesome arising...
99. Whatever mental states are unwholesome... whatever mental states are indeterminate... whatever mental states are mental, all of them have mentality as cause... have mentality as source... have mentality as origin... have mentality as production... have mentality as origination... have mentality as nutriment... have mentality as object... have mentality as condition... have mentality as arising...
Origination, nutriment, object, condition, and with arising.
The Section on Analytic Explanation is concluded.
The Pāḷi on the Pairs on Roots is concluded.
Homage to the Blessed One, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Enlightened One
2.
Pairs on Aggregates
1.
The Description Section
Synopsis
1. The five aggregates – the aggregate of matter, the aggregate of feeling, the aggregate of perception, the aggregate of mental activities, the aggregate of consciousness.
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
2. Is matter the aggregate of matter?
Is the aggregate of matter matter?
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling?
Is the aggregate of feeling feeling?
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Is the aggregate of perception perception?
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Is the aggregate of mental activities activities?
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness?
Is the aggregate of consciousness consciousness?
Opposite
3. Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not the aggregate of matter not matter?
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not the aggregate of feeling not feeling?
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not the aggregate of perception not perception?
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not the aggregate of mental activities not activities?
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness?
Is what is not the aggregate of consciousness not consciousness?
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
4. Is matter the aggregate of matter?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of perception?
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
5. Is feeling the aggregate of feeling?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of matter?
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of perception?
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
6. Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of matter?
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
7. Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of matter?
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of perception?
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
8. Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of matter?
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of perception?
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness?
Are the aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
Opposite
9. Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness?
10. Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness?
11. Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness?
12. Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness?
13. Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter?
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling?
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception?
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness?
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities?
3.
The Section on Pure Aggregates
Conformity
14. Is matter an aggregate?
Are the aggregates matter?
Is feeling an aggregate?
Are the aggregates feeling?
Is perception an aggregate?
Are the aggregates perception?
Are activities an aggregate?
Are the aggregates activities?
Is consciousness an aggregate?
Are the aggregates consciousness?
Opposite
15. Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not matter?
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not feeling?
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not perception?
Is what is not activities not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not activities?
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not consciousness?
4.
The Section on Pure Aggregates Root Wheel
Conformity
16. Is matter an aggregate?
Are the aggregates feeling?
Is matter an aggregate?
Are the aggregates perception?
Is matter an aggregate?
Are the aggregates activities?
Is matter an aggregate?
Are the aggregates consciousness?
17. Is feeling an aggregate?
Are the aggregates matter?
Is feeling an aggregate?
Are the aggregates perception?
Is feeling an aggregate?
Are the aggregates activities?
Is feeling an aggregate?
Are the aggregates consciousness?
18. Is perception an aggregate?
Are the aggregates matter?
Is perception an aggregate?
Are the aggregates feeling?
Is perception an aggregate?
Are the aggregates activities?
Is perception an aggregate?
Are the aggregates consciousness?
19. Are activities an aggregate?
Are the aggregates matter?
Are activities an aggregate?
Are the aggregates feeling?
Are activities an aggregate?
Are the aggregates perception?
Are activities an aggregate?
Are the aggregates consciousness?
20. Is consciousness an aggregate?
Are the aggregates matter?
Is consciousness an aggregate?
Are the aggregates feeling?
Is consciousness an aggregate?
Are the aggregates perception?
Is consciousness an aggregate?
Are the aggregates activities?
Opposite
21. Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not feeling?
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not perception?
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not activities?
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not consciousness?
22. Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not matter?
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not perception?
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not activities?
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not consciousness?
23. Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not matter?
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not feeling?
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not activities?
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not consciousness?
24. Is what is not activities not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not matter?
Is what is not activities not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not feeling?
Is what is not activities not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not perception?
Is what is not activities not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not consciousness?
25. Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not matter?
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not feeling?
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not perception?
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Is what is not aggregates not activities?
The Section on Synopsis of Description.
Exposition
1.
Analytic Explanation of the Description Section
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
26. Is matter the aggregate of matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is matter, not the aggregate of matter. The aggregate of matter is both matter and the aggregate of matter.
Is the aggregate of matter matter? Yes.
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is the aggregate of feeling feeling? Yes.
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Perception of view is perception, not the aggregate of perception. The aggregate of perception is both perception and the aggregate of perception.
Is the aggregate of perception perception? Yes.
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remaining activities are not the aggregate of mental activities. The aggregate of mental activities is both activities and the aggregate of mental activities.
Is the aggregate of mental activities activities? Yes.
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is the aggregate of consciousness consciousness? Yes.
Opposite
27. Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not the aggregate of matter not matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is not the aggregate of matter, but is matter. Setting aside matter and the aggregate of matter, the remainder is neither matter nor the aggregate of matter.
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not the aggregate of feeling not feeling? Yes.
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not the aggregate of perception not perception?
Perception of view is not the aggregate of perception, but is perception. Setting aside perception and the aggregate of perception, the remainder is neither perception nor the aggregate of perception.
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not the aggregate of mental activities not activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remainder is not the aggregate of mental activities, but is activities. Setting aside activities and the aggregate of mental activities, the remainder is neither activities nor the aggregate of mental activities.
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not the aggregate of consciousness not consciousness? Yes.
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
28. Is matter the aggregate of matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is matter, not the aggregate of matter. The aggregate of matter is both matter and the aggregate of matter.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling.
The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is matter, not the aggregate of matter. The aggregate of matter is both matter and the aggregate of matter.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is matter, not the aggregate of matter. The aggregate of matter is both matter and the aggregate of matter.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is matter the aggregate of matter?
What has a dear nature and a pleasant nature is matter, not the aggregate of matter. The aggregate of matter is both matter and the aggregate of matter.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
29. Is feeling the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is feeling the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
30. Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Perception of view is perception, not the aggregate of perception. The aggregate of perception is both perception and the aggregate of perception.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Perception of view is perception, not the aggregate of perception. The aggregate of perception is both perception and the aggregate of perception.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Perception of view is perception, not the aggregate of perception. The aggregate of perception is both perception and the aggregate of perception.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is perception the aggregate of perception?
Perception of view is perception, not the aggregate of perception. The aggregate of perception is both perception and the aggregate of perception.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
31. Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remaining activities are not the aggregate of mental activities. The aggregate of mental activities is both activities and the aggregate of mental activities.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remaining activities are not the aggregate of mental activities. The aggregate of mental activities is both activities and the aggregate of mental activities.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remaining activities are not the aggregate of mental activities. The aggregate of mental activities is both activities and the aggregate of mental activities.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Are activities the aggregate of mental activities?
Setting aside the aggregate of mental activities, the remaining activities are not the aggregate of mental activities. The aggregate of mental activities is both activities and the aggregate of mental activities.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
32. Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is consciousness the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Opposite
33. Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not matter not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
34. Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
35. Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not perception not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
36. Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not activities not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
37. Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
3.
The Section on Pure Aggregates
Conformity
38. Is matter an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is feeling an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is perception an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Are activities an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is consciousness an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
Opposite
39. Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Setting aside matter, the remaining aggregates are not matter, but are aggregates. Setting aside matter and the aggregates, the remainder is neither matter nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Setting aside feeling, the remaining aggregates are not feeling, but are aggregates. Setting aside feeling and the aggregates, the remainder is neither feeling nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Setting aside perception, the remaining aggregates are not perception, but are aggregates. Setting aside perception and the aggregates, the remainder is neither perception nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not activities not an aggregate? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Setting aside consciousness, the remaining aggregates are not consciousness, but are aggregates. Setting aside consciousness and the aggregates, the remainder is neither consciousness nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
4.
The Section on Pure Aggregates Root Wheel
Conformity
40. Is matter an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is matter an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is matter an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is matter an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
41. Is feeling an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is feeling an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is feeling an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is feeling an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
42. Is perception an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is perception an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is perception an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Is perception an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
43. Are activities an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Are activities an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Are activities an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Are activities an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of consciousness?
The aggregate of consciousness is both an aggregate and the aggregate of consciousness. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of consciousness.
44. Is consciousness an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of matter?
The aggregate of matter is both an aggregate and the aggregate of matter. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of matter.
Is consciousness an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of feeling?
The aggregate of feeling is both an aggregate and the aggregate of feeling. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of feeling.
Is consciousness an aggregate?
Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of perception?
The aggregate of perception is both an aggregate and the aggregate of perception. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of perception.
Is consciousness an aggregate? Yes.
Are aggregates the aggregate of mental activities?
The aggregate of mental activities is both an aggregate and the aggregate of mental activities. The remaining aggregates are not the aggregate of mental activities.
Opposite
45. Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Setting aside matter, the remaining aggregates are not matter, but are aggregates. Setting aside matter and the aggregates, the remainder is neither matter nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Setting aside matter, the remaining aggregates are not matter, but are aggregates. Setting aside matter and the aggregates, the remainder is neither matter nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Setting aside matter, the remaining aggregates are not matter, but are aggregates. Setting aside matter and the aggregates, the remainder is neither matter nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not matter not an aggregate?
Setting aside matter, the remaining aggregates are not matter, but are aggregates. Setting aside matter and the aggregates, the remainder is neither matter nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
46. Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Setting aside feeling, the remaining aggregates are not feeling, but are aggregates. Setting aside feeling and the aggregates, the remainder is neither feeling nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Setting aside feeling, the remaining aggregates are not feeling, but are aggregates. Setting aside feeling and the aggregates, the remainder is neither feeling nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Setting aside feeling, the remaining aggregates are not feeling, but are aggregates. Setting aside feeling and the aggregates, the remainder is neither feeling nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not feeling not an aggregate?
Setting aside feeling, the remaining aggregates are not feeling, but are aggregates. Setting aside feeling and the aggregates, the remainder is neither feeling nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
47. Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Setting aside perception, the remaining aggregates are not perception, but are aggregates. Setting aside perception and the aggregates, the remainder is neither perception nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Setting aside perception, the remaining aggregates are not perception, but are aggregates. Setting aside perception and the aggregates, the remainder is neither perception nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Setting aside perception, the remaining aggregates are not perception, but are aggregates. Setting aside perception and the aggregates, the remainder is neither perception nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
Is what is not perception not an aggregate?
Setting aside perception, the remaining aggregates are not perception, but are aggregates. Setting aside perception and the aggregates, the remainder is neither perception nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
48. Is what is not activities not an aggregate? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not activities not an aggregate? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not activities not an aggregate? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not activities not an aggregate? Yes.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of consciousness? Yes.
49. Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Setting aside consciousness, the remaining aggregates are not consciousness, but are aggregates. Setting aside consciousness and the aggregates, the remainder is neither consciousness nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of matter? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Setting aside consciousness, the remaining aggregates are not consciousness, but are aggregates. Setting aside consciousness and the aggregates, the remainder is neither consciousness nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Setting aside consciousness, the remaining aggregates are not consciousness, but are aggregates. Setting aside consciousness and the aggregates, the remainder is neither consciousness nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of perception? Yes.
Is what is not consciousness not an aggregate?
Setting aside consciousness, the remaining aggregates are not consciousness, but are aggregates. Setting aside consciousness and the aggregates, the remainder is neither consciousness nor aggregates.
Is what is not aggregates not the aggregate of mental activities? Yes.
The Section on Analytic Explanation of Description.
2.
The Section on Occurrence 1.
The Section on Arising
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
50. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of matter arises.
Conformity Place
51.
Where the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling arise there?In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of matter does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of matter arises.
Conformity - Person - Place
52. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of matter arises.
Negative Person
53. For whom the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
54. Where the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise there? It arises.
Negative - Person - Place
55. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them there. For all those passing away, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them there. For all those passing away, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
56. For whom the aggregate of matter arose, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling arose, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
57. Where the aggregate of matter arose, did the aggregate of feeling arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling did not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling arose.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling arose, did the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of matter did not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of matter arose.
Conformity - Person - Place
58. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arose, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling arose.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling arose, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of matter did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of matter arose.
Negative Person
59. For whom the aggregate of matter had not arisen, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
60. Where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen there? It had arisen.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, had the aggregate of matter not arisen there? It had arisen.
Negative - Person - Place
61. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not arisen, but the aggregate of feeling had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not arisen and the aggregate of feeling had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, but the aggregate of matter had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not arisen and the aggregate of matter had not arisen.
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
62. For whom the aggregate of matter will arise, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will arise, will the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter will arise.
Conformity Place
63. Where the aggregate of matter will arise, will the aggregate of feeling arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter will arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter will arise and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will arise, will the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter will not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter will arise.
Conformity - Person - Place
64. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will arise, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter will arise and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will arise, will the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter will arise.
Negative Person
65. For whom the aggregate of matter will not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the aggregate of matter will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence, for them both the aggregate of matter will not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not arise, will the aggregate of matter not arise for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
66. Where the aggregate of matter will not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise there? It will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, will the aggregate of matter not arise there? It will arise.
Negative - Person - Place
67. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the aggregate of matter will not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, will the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of matter will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of matter will not arise.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
68. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling arose, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of matter arises.
69. For whom the aggregate of feeling arises, did the aggregate of perception arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception arose, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of perception arose, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of perception arose and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Conformity Place
70. Where the aggregate of matter arises, did the aggregate of feeling arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling did not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling arose.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling arose, does the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of matter does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of matter arises.
71. Where the aggregate of feeling arises, did the aggregate of perception arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception arose, does the aggregate of feeling arise there? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
72. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arises, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling did not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling arose.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling arose, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of matter arises.
73. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arises, did the aggregate of perception arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of perception did not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of perception arose.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception arose, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception arose, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of perception arose and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Negative Person
74. For whom the aggregate of matter does not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one? There is not.
75. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not arise, had the aggregate of perception not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception had not arisen, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
76. Where the aggregate of matter does not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen there? It had arisen.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, does the aggregate of matter not arise there? It arises.
77. Where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, did the aggregate of perception not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception had not arisen, does the aggregate of feeling not arise there? Yes.
Negative - Person - Place
78. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not arisen and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
79. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, had the aggregate of perception not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception had not arisen, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the aggregate of perception had not arisen, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception had not arisen and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
80. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them. For the others being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will arise, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter arises.
81. For whom the aggregate of feeling arises, will the aggregate of perception arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of perception will not arise for them. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of perception will arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will arise, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of perception will arise, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of perception will arise and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Conformity Place
82. Where the aggregate of matter arises, will the aggregate of feeling arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will arise, does the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter arises.
83. Where the aggregate of feeling arises, will the aggregate of perception arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception will arise, does the aggregate of feeling arise there? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
84. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arises, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will arise, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter arises.
85. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arises, will the aggregate of perception arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence who are being reborn, for them there the aggregate of feeling arises, but the aggregate of perception will not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arises and the aggregate of perception will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will arise, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception will arise, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of perception will arise and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Negative Person
86. For whom the aggregate of matter does not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
87. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not arise, will the aggregate of perception not arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception will not arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the aggregate of perception will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of perception will not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
88. Where the aggregate of matter does not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise there? It will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise there? It arises.
89. Where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, will the aggregate of perception not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception will not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise there? Yes.
Negative - Person - Place
90. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of matter does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
91. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, will the aggregate of perception not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception will not fail to arise for them there. For non-percipient beings attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence who are being reborn, for them there the aggregate of perception will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does not fail to arise for them there. For non-percipient beings attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of perception will not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
92. For whom the aggregate of matter arose, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will arise, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one? Yes.
93. For whom the aggregate of feeling arose, will the aggregate of perception arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of perception will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of perception will arise.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will arise, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
94. Where the aggregate of matter arose, will the aggregate of feeling arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will arise, did the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter did not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter arose.
95. Where the aggregate of feeling arose, will the aggregate of perception arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception will arise, did the aggregate of feeling arise there? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
96. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arose, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence among non-percipient beings in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will arise, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will arise, but the aggregate of matter did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will arise and the aggregate of matter arose.
97. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arose, will the aggregate of perception arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence, for them there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of perception will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of perception will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will arise, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there? Yes.
Negative Person
98. For whom the aggregate of matter had not arisen, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not arise, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
99. For whom the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, will the aggregate of perception not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
The Negative Section on Place
100. Where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, will the aggregate of feeling not arise there? It will arise.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, had the aggregate of matter not arisen there? It had arisen.
101. Where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, will the aggregate of perception not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception will not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen there? Yes.
Negative - Person - Place
102. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not arisen, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not arisen and the aggregate of feeling will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one there?
For those in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of matter had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of matter had not arisen.
103. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, will the aggregate of perception not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not arise, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one there?
For those in their last existence, for them there the aggregate of perception will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling had not failed to arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will not arise and the aggregate of feeling had not arisen.
The Section on Arising is concluded.
2.
Occurrence 2.
The Section on Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
104. For whom the aggregate of matter ceases, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one?
For those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of matter ceases.
Conformity Place
105. Where the aggregate of matter ceases, does the aggregate of feeling cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter cease there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of matter does not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of matter ceases.
Conformity - Person - Place
106. For whom and where the aggregate of matter ceases, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of matter ceases.
Negative Person
107. For whom the aggregate of matter does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the aggregate of matter does not cease and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one?
For those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of matter does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of matter does not cease.
The Negative Section on Place
108. Where the aggregate of matter does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not cease there? It ceases.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not cease there? It ceases.
Negative - Person - Place
109. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them there. For all those being reborn, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not cease and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of matter does cease for them there. For all those being reborn, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of matter does not cease.
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
110. For whom the aggregate of matter had ceased, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had ceased, did the aggregate of matter cease for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
111. Where the aggregate of matter had ceased, did the aggregate of feeling cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter had ceased and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, did the aggregate of matter cease there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter had not ceased there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter had ceased.
Conformity - Person - Place
112. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had ceased, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter had ceased and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, did the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter had not ceased for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter had ceased.
Negative Person
113. For whom the aggregate of matter had not ceased, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, did the aggregate of matter not cease for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
114. Where the aggregate of matter had not ceased, did the aggregate of feeling not cease there? It had ceased.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, did the aggregate of matter not cease there? It had ceased.
Negative - Person - Place
115. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not ceased, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not ceased, but the aggregate of feeling had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not ceased and the aggregate of feeling had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, did the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, but the aggregate of matter had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not ceased and the aggregate of matter had not ceased.
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
116. For whom the aggregate of matter will cease, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, will the aggregate of matter cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter will cease.
Conformity Place
117. Where the aggregate of matter will cease, will the aggregate of feeling cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter will cease, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter will cease and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will cease, will the aggregate of matter cease there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter will not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter will cease.
Conformity - Person - Place
118. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will cease, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will cease, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter will cease and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, will the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter will not cease for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter will cease.
Negative Person
119. For whom the aggregate of matter will not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the aggregate of matter will not cease, but the aggregate of feeling will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of matter will not cease and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, will the aggregate of matter not cease for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
120. Where the aggregate of matter will not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not cease there? It will cease.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, will the aggregate of matter not cease there? It will cease.
Negative - Person - Place
121. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will not cease, but the aggregate of feeling will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of matter will not cease and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, will the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter will not cease.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
122. For whom the aggregate of matter ceases, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had ceased, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter ceases.
123. For whom the aggregate of feeling ceases, did the aggregate of perception cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception had ceased, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of perception had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of perception had ceased and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Conformity Place
124. Where the aggregate of matter ceases, did the aggregate of feeling cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, does the aggregate of matter cease there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter does not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter ceases.
125. Where the aggregate of feeling ceases, did the aggregate of perception cease there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception had ceased, does the aggregate of feeling cease there? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
126. For whom and where the aggregate of matter ceases, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased for them there. For the others passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter ceases.
127. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling ceases, did the aggregate of perception cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of perception had not ceased for them there. For the others passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of perception had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception had ceased, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of perception had ceased and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Negative Person
128. For whom the aggregate of matter does not cease, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? It had ceased.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one? There is not.
129. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not cease, did the aggregate of perception not cease for that one? It had ceased.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception had not ceased, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
130. Where the aggregate of matter does not cease (the 'where' section should be completed in full).
Negative - Person - Place
131. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not cease, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling had ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not cease and the aggregate of feeling had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, but the aggregate of matter does cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not ceased and the aggregate of matter does not cease.
132. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, did the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of perception had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of perception had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception had not ceased, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the aggregate of perception had not ceased, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception had not ceased and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
133. For whom the aggregate of matter ceases, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them. For the others passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter ceases.
134. For whom the aggregate of feeling ceases, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them. For the others passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will cease, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Conformity Place
135. Where the aggregate of matter ceases... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
136. For whom and where the aggregate of matter ceases, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter ceases, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For the others passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter ceases and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, does the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter ceases.
137. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling ceases, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them there. For the others passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will cease, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Negative Person
138. For whom the aggregate of matter does not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those passing away from the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the aggregate of matter does not cease and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter does cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter does not cease.
139. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not cease, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one? It will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? It ceases.
The Negative Section on Place
140. Where the aggregate of matter does not cease... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
141. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not cease and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, does the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter ceases for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter does not cease.
142. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of perception will not not cease for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there the aggregate of perception will not cease, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will not cease and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
143. For whom the aggregate of matter had ceased, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them the aggregate of matter had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of matter had ceased and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, did the aggregate of matter cease for that one? Yes.
144. For whom the aggregate of feeling had ceased, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will cease, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
145. Where the aggregate of matter had ceased... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
146. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had ceased, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had ceased, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter had ceased and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, did the aggregate of matter cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter had ceased.
147. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will cease, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Negative Person
148. For whom the aggregate of matter had not ceased, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, had the aggregate of matter not ceased for that one? It had ceased.
149. For whom the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not cease, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? It had ceased.
The Negative Section on Place
150. Where the aggregate of matter had not ceased... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
151. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not ceased, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not ceased, but the aggregate of feeling will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not ceased and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, did the aggregate of matter not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter had not not ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter had not ceased.
152. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, but the aggregate of perception will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not ceased and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not cease, did the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there the aggregate of perception will not cease, but the aggregate of feeling had not not ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will not cease and the aggregate of feeling had not ceased.
The Section on Cessation.
3.
The Section on Arising and Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
153. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one? No.
154. For whom the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of perception cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception ceases, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? No.
Conformity Place
155. Where the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling does not cease there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling ceases.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the aggregate of feeling ceases, but the aggregate of matter does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the aggregate of feeling ceases and the aggregate of matter arises.
156. Where the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of perception cease there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception ceases, does the aggregate of feeling arise there? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
157. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arises, does the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there? No.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling ceases, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one there? No.
158. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arises, does the aggregate of perception cease for that one there? No.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception ceases, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there? No.
Negative Person
159. For whom the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them. For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them. For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
160. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of perception not cease for that one?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception does cease for them. For non-percipient beings, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception does not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the aggregate of perception does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them. For non-percipient beings, for them both the aggregate of perception does not cease and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
161. Where the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not cease there? It ceases.
Or else, where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not arise there? It arises.
162. Where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of perception not cease there? Yes.
Or else, where the aggregate of perception does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not arise there? Yes.
Negative - Person - Place
163. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not arise, does the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling does cease for them there. For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling does not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not cease, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not cease, but the aggregate of matter does arise for them there. For those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not cease and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
164. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, does the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception does cease for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception does not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception does not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception does not cease, but the aggregate of feeling does arise for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception does not cease and the aggregate of feeling does not arise.
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
165. For whom the aggregate of matter arose, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had ceased, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one? Yes.
166. For whom the aggregate of feeling arose, did the aggregate of perception cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception had ceased, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
167. Where the aggregate of matter arose... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
168. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arose, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling had not ceased for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had ceased, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter had not arisen for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter arose.
169. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arose, did the aggregate of perception cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception had ceased, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there? Yes.
Negative Person
170. For whom the aggregate of matter had not arisen, had the aggregate of feeling not ceased for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one? There is not.
171. For whom the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, did the aggregate of perception not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception had not ceased, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
172. Where the aggregate of matter had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
173. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, had the aggregate of feeling not ceased for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not arisen, but the aggregate of feeling had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not arisen and the aggregate of feeling had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not ceased, but the aggregate of matter had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not ceased and the aggregate of matter had not arisen.
174. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, did the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception had not ceased, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one there? Yes.
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
175. For whom the aggregate of matter will arise, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, will the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter will arise.
176. For whom the aggregate of feeling will arise, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will cease, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Conformity Place
177. Where the aggregate of matter will arise... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
178. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will arise, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter will arise and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, will the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter will arise.
179. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling will arise, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will cease, will the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence who are being reborn, for them there the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling will arise.
Negative Person
180. For whom the aggregate of matter will not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the aggregate of matter will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of matter will not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, will the aggregate of matter not arise for that one? Yes.
181. For whom the aggregate of feeling will not arise, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of perception will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
182. Where the aggregate of matter will not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
183. For whom and where the aggregate of matter will not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter will not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of matter will not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, will the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter will not arise.
184. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not arise, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not arise, but the aggregate of perception does not fail to cease for them there. For non-percipient beings attaining final nibbāna, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not arise and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not cease, will the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there? Yes.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
185. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, did the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling had ceased, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling had ceased, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling had ceased and the aggregate of matter arises. Etc.
(As analysed in the section on arising regarding present and past, so it should be analysed here.)
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
186. For whom the aggregate of matter arises, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter arises.
187. For whom the aggregate of feeling arises, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will cease, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Conformity Place
188. Where the aggregate of matter arises... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
189. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arises, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of matter arises, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter arises and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, does the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter arises.
190. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arises, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will cease, does the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling arises.
Negative Person
191. For whom the aggregate of matter does not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those being reborn in the immaterial realm, for them the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbana, for them both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one? Yes.
192. For whom the aggregate of feeling does not arise, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one?
For all those passing away being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
193. Where the aggregate of matter does not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
194. For whom and where the aggregate of matter does not arise, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of matter does not arise, but the aggregate of feeling will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of matter does not arise and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, does the aggregate of matter not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter arises for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter does not arise.
195. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling does not arise, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling does not arise, but the aggregate of perception will cease for them there. For non-percipient beings attaining final nibbana, for them there both the aggregate of feeling does not arise and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not cease, does the aggregate of feeling not arise for that one there? Yes.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
196. For whom the aggregate of matter arose, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will cease, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one? Yes.
197. For whom the aggregate of feeling arose, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will cease, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
198. Where the aggregate of matter arose... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
199. For whom and where the aggregate of matter arose, will the aggregate of feeling cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of matter arose, but the aggregate of feeling will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of matter arose and the aggregate of feeling will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will cease, did the aggregate of matter arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode from the immaterial realm, for them there the aggregate of feeling will cease, but the aggregate of matter did not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will cease and the aggregate of matter arose.
200. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling arose, will the aggregate of perception cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the aggregate of feeling arose, but the aggregate of perception will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling arose and the aggregate of perception will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will cease, did the aggregate of feeling arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the aggregate of perception will cease, but the aggregate of feeling had not arisen for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will cease and the aggregate of feeling arose.
Negative Person
201. For whom the aggregate of matter had not arisen, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of feeling will not cease, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
202. For whom the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the aggregate of perception will not cease, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
The Negative Section on Place
203. Where the aggregate of matter had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
204. For whom and where the aggregate of matter had not arisen, will the aggregate of feeling not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for immaterial beings, for them there the aggregate of matter had not arisen, but the aggregate of feeling will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of matter had not arisen and the aggregate of feeling will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of feeling will not cease, had the aggregate of matter not arisen for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, for them there the aggregate of feeling will not cease, but the aggregate of matter had not not arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the aggregate of feeling will not cease and the aggregate of matter had not arisen.
205. For whom and where the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, will the aggregate of perception not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the aggregate of feeling had not arisen, but the aggregate of perception will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of feeling had not arisen and the aggregate of perception will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the aggregate of perception will not cease, had the aggregate of feeling not arisen for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them there the aggregate of perception will not cease, but the aggregate of feeling had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the aggregate of perception will not cease and the aggregate of feeling had not arisen.
The Section on Arising and Cessation.
The Section on Occurrence is concluded.
3.
The Section on Full Understanding
1.
The Section on Present
206. Whoever fully understands the aggregate of material body, does he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever fully understands the aggregate of feeling, does he fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
Whoever does not fully understand the aggregate of material body, does he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever does not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, does he not fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
2.
The Section on Past
207. Whoever fully understood the aggregate of material body, did he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever fully understood the aggregate of feeling, did he fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
Whoever did not fully understand the aggregate of material body, did he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, did he not fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
3.
The Section on Future
208. Whoever will fully understand the aggregate of material body, will he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the aggregate of feeling, will he fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
Whoever will not fully understand the aggregate of material body, will he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling? Yes.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, will he not fully understand the aggregate of material body? Yes.
4.
The Section on Present and Past
209. Whoever fully understands the aggregate of material body, did he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? No.
Or else, whoever fully understood the aggregate of feeling, does he fully understand the aggregate of material body? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the aggregate of material body, did he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling?
A Worthy One does not fully understand the aggregate of material body, but it is not that he did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons do not fully understand the aggregate of material body and did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling.
Or else, whoever did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, does he not fully understand the aggregate of material body?
The possessor of the highest path did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, but it is not that he does not fully understand the aggregate of material body. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons did not fully understand the aggregate of feeling and do not fully understand the aggregate of material body.
5.
The Section on Present and Future
210. Whoever fully understands the aggregate of material body, will he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? No.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the aggregate of feeling, does he fully understand the aggregate of material body? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the aggregate of material body, will he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling?
Those who will obtain the path, they do not fully understand the aggregate of material body, but it is not that they will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they do not fully understand the aggregate of material body and will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, does he not fully understand the aggregate of material body?
The possessor of the highest path will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, but it is not that he does not fully understand the aggregate of material body. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling and do not fully understand the aggregate of material body.
6.
The Section on Past and Future
211. Whoever fully understood the aggregate of material body, will he fully understand the aggregate of feeling? No.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the aggregate of feeling, did he fully understand the aggregate of material body? No.
Whoever did not fully understand the aggregate of material body, will he not fully understand the aggregate of feeling?
Those who will obtain the path, they did not fully understand the aggregate of material body, but it is not that they will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they did not fully understand the aggregate of material body and will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, did he not fully understand the aggregate of material body?
A Worthy One will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling, but it is not that he did not fully understand the aggregate of material body. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not fully understand the aggregate of feeling and did not fully understand the aggregate of material body.
The Section on Full Understanding.
The Pāḷi on the Pairs on Aggregates is concluded.
Homage to the Blessed One, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Enlightened One
3.
Pairs on Sense Bases
1.
The Description Section
Synopsis
1. The twelve sense bases - the eye sense base, the ear sense base, the nose sense base, the tongue sense base, the body sense base, the visible form sense base, the sound sense base, the odour sense base, the flavour sense base, the touch sense base, the mind sense base, the mind-object sense base.
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
2. Is the eye the eye sense base?
Is the eye sense base the eye?
Is the ear the ear sense base?
Is the ear sense base the ear?
Is the nose the nose sense base?
Is the nose sense base the nose?
Is the tongue the tongue sense base?
Is the tongue sense base the tongue?
Is the body the body sense base?
Is the body sense base the body?
Is visible form the visible form sense base?
Is the visible form sense base visible form?
Is sound the sound sense base?
Is the sound sense base sound?
Is odour the odour sense base?
Is the odour sense base odour?
Is flavour the flavour sense base?
Is the flavour sense base flavour?
Is touch the touch sense base?
Is the touch sense base touch?
Is mind the mind sense base?
Is the mind sense base mind?
Is a mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Is the mind-object sense base a mental phenomenon?
Opposite
3. Is what is not eye not the eye sense base?
Is what is not the eye sense base not eye?
Is what is not ear not the ear sense base?
Is what is not the ear sense base not ear?
Is what is not nose not the nose sense base?
Is what is not the nose sense base not nose?
Is what is not tongue not the tongue sense base?
Is what is not the tongue sense base not tongue?
Is what is not body not the body sense base?
Is what is not the body sense base not body?
Is what is not visible form not the visible form sense base?
Is what is not the visible form sense base not visible form?
Is what is not sound not the sound sense base?
Is what is not the sound sense base not sound?
Is what is not odour not the odour sense base?
Is what is not the odour sense base not odour?
Is what is not flavour not the flavour sense base?
Is what is not the flavour sense base not flavour?
Is what is not tangible object not the touch sense base?
Is what is not the touch sense base not tangible object?
Is what is not mind not the mind sense base?
Is what is not the mind sense base not mind?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not the mind-object sense base not mental phenomenon?
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
4. Is the eye the eye sense base?
Is a sense base the ear sense base?
Is the eye the eye sense base?
Is a sense base the nose sense base?
Is the eye the eye sense base?
Is a sense base the tongue sense base? Etc.
Is the eye the eye sense base?
Is a sense base the mind-object sense base?
Is the ear the ear sense base?
Is a sense base the eye sense base?
Is the ear the ear sense base?
Is a sense base the nose sense base? Etc.
Is the ear the ear sense base?
Is a sense base the mind-object sense base?
Is the nose the nose sense base?
Is a sense base the eye sense base? Etc.
Is the nose the nose sense base?
Is a sense base the mind-object sense base? Etc.
Is a mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Is a sense base the eye sense base?
Is a mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Is a sense base the ear sense base? Etc.
Is a mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Is a sense base the mind sense base?
(A wheel should be bound)
Opposite
5. Is what is not eye not the eye sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base?
Is what is not eye not the eye sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the nose sense base? Etc.
Is what is not eye not the eye sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not ear not the ear sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Etc.
Is what is not ear not the ear sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not nose not the nose sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Etc.
Is what is not nose not the nose sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not the mind sense base?
(A wheel should be bound)
3.
The Pure Sense Base Section
Conformity
6. Is eye a sense base?
Is a sense base eye?
Is ear a sense base?
Is a sense base ear?
Is nose a sense base?
Is a sense base nose?
Is tongue a sense base?
Is a sense base tongue?
Is body a sense base?
Is a sense base body?
Is visible form a sense base?
Is a sense base visible form?
Is sound a sense base?
Is a sense base sound?
Is odour a sense base?
Is a sense base odour?
Is flavour a sense base?
Is a sense base flavour?
Is tangible object a sense base?
Is a sense base tangible object?
Is mind a sense base?
Is a sense base mind?
Is mental phenomenon a sense base?
Is a sense base mental phenomenon?
Opposite
7. Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not eye?
Is what is not ear not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not ear?
Is what is not nose not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not nose?
Is what is not tongue not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not tongue?
Is what is not body not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not body?
Is what is not matter not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not matter?
Is what is not sound not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not sound?
Is what is not odour not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not odour?
Is what is not flavour not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not flavour?
Is what is not tangible object not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not tangible object?
Is what is not mind not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mind?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mental phenomenon?
4.
The Pure Sense Base Root Wheel Section
Conformity
8. Is eye a sense base?
Is a sense base ear? Etc.
Is eye a sense base?
Is a sense base mental phenomenon?
Is ear a sense base?
Is a sense base eye? Etc.
Is ear a sense base?
Is a sense base mental phenomenon?
Is nose a sense base?
Is a sense base eye? Etc.
Is nose a sense base?
Is a sense base mental phenomenon? Etc.
Is mental phenomenon a sense base?
Is a sense base eye?
Is mental phenomenon a sense base?
Is a sense base ear? Etc.
Is mental phenomenon a sense base?
Is a sense base mind?
(A wheel should be bound)
Opposite
9. Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not ear?
Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not nose? Etc.
Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mental phenomenon?
Is what is not ear not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not eye? Etc.
Is what is not ear not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mental phenomenon?
Is what is not nose not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not eye? Etc.
Is what is not nose not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mental phenomenon? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not eye?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not ear? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base?
Is what is not a sense base not mind?
(A wheel should be bound)
The Section on Synopsis of Description.
Exposition
1.
Analytic Explanation of the Description Section
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
10. Is eye the eye sense base?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye sense base. The eye sense base is both eye and the eye sense base.
Is the eye sense base eye? Yes.
Is ear the ear sense base?
The divine ear and the stream of craving are ear, not the ear sense base. The ear sense base is both ear and the ear sense base.
Is the ear sense base ear? Yes.
Is nose the nose sense base? Yes.
Is the nose sense base nose? Yes.
Is tongue the tongue sense base? Yes.
Is the tongue sense base tongue? Yes.
Is body the body sense base?
Setting aside the body sense base, the remaining body is not the body sense base. The body sense base is both body and the body sense base.
Is the body sense base body? Yes.
Is matter the visible form sense base?
Setting aside the visible form sense base, the remaining matter is not the visible form sense base. The visible form sense base is both matter and the visible form sense base.
Is the visible form sense base matter? Yes.
Is sound the sound sense base? Yes.
Is the sound sense base sound? Yes.
Is odour the odour sense base?
The odour of morality, the odour of concentration, the odour of wisdom are odour, not the odour sense base. The odour sense base is both odour and the odour sense base.
Is the odour sense base odour? Yes.
Is flavour the flavour sense base?
The flavour of meaning, the flavour of the teaching, the flavour of liberation are flavour, not the flavour sense base. The flavour sense base is both flavour and the flavour sense base.
Is the flavour sense base flavour? Yes.
Is tangible object the touch sense base? Yes.
Is the touch sense base tangible object? Yes.
Is mind the mind sense base? Yes.
Is the mind sense base mind? Yes.
Is mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Setting aside the mind-object sense base, the remaining mental phenomenon is not the mind-object sense base. The mind-object sense base is both mental phenomenon and the mind-object sense base.
Is the mind-object sense base mental phenomenon? Yes.
Opposite
11. Is what is not eye not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the eye sense base not eye?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are not the eye sense base, but are eye. Setting aside eye and the eye sense base, the remainder is neither eye nor the eye sense base.
Is what is not ear not the ear sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the ear sense base not ear?
The divine ear and the stream of craving are not the ear sense base, but are ear. Setting aside ear and the ear sense base, the remainder is neither ear nor the ear sense base.
Is what is not nose not the nose sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the nose sense base not nose? Yes.
Is what is not tongue not the tongue sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the tongue sense base not tongue? Yes.
Is what is not body not the body sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the body sense base not body?
Setting aside the body sense base, the remaining body is not the body sense base. Setting aside body and the body sense base, the remainder is neither body nor the body sense base.
Is what is not matter not the visible form sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the visible form sense base not matter?
Setting aside the visible form sense base, the remaining matter is not the visible form sense base. Setting aside matter and the visible form sense base, the remainder is neither matter nor the visible form sense base.
Is what is not sound not the sound sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the sound sense base not sound? Yes.
Is what is not odour not the odour sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the odour sense base not odour?
The odour of morality, the odour of concentration, the odour of wisdom are not the odour sense base, but are odour. Setting aside odour and the odour sense base, the remainder is neither odour nor the odour sense base.
Is what is not flavour not the flavour sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the flavour sense base not flavour?
The flavour of meaning, the flavour of the teaching, the flavour of liberation are not the flavour sense base, but are flavour. Setting aside flavour and the flavour sense base, the remainder is neither flavour nor the flavour sense base.
Is what is not tangible object not the touch sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the touch sense base not tangible object? Yes.
Is what is not mind not the mind sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the mind sense base not mind? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not the mind-object sense base not mental phenomenon?
Setting aside the mind-object sense base, the remainder is not the mind-object sense base, but is mental phenomenon. Setting aside mental phenomenon and the mind-object sense base, the remainder is neither mental phenomenon nor the mind-object sense base.
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
12. Is eye the eye sense base?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye sense base. The eye sense base is both eye and the eye sense base. Etc.
Is a sense base the ear sense base?
The ear sense base is both a sense base and the ear sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the ear sense base.
Is eye the eye sense base?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye sense base. The eye sense base is both eye and the eye sense base. Etc.
Is a sense base the nose sense base? Etc. Is a sense base the mind-object sense base?
The mind-object sense base is both a sense base and the mind-object sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the mind-object sense base.
Is ear the ear sense base? Etc. The remaining sense bases are not the mind-object sense base. Etc.
Is mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Setting aside the mind-object sense base, the remaining mental phenomenon is not the mind-object sense base. The mind-object sense base is both mental phenomenon and the mind-object sense base. Etc.
Is a sense base the eye sense base?
The eye sense base is both a sense base and the eye sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the eye sense base.
Is mental phenomenon the mind-object sense base?
Setting aside the mind-object sense base, the remaining mental phenomenon is not the mind-object sense base. The mind-object sense base is both mental phenomenon and the mind-object sense base.
Is a sense base the ear sense base? Etc. Is a sense base the mind sense base?
The mind sense base is both a sense base and the mind sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the mind sense base.
(A wheel based on each single term should be bound by one without confusion).
Opposite
13. Is what is not eye not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base? Yes.
Is what is not eye not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the nose sense base? Yes. Etc.
Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not ear not the ear sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Etc. Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not nose not the nose sense base? Etc. Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base?
Yes. Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base? Etc. Is what is not a sense base not the mind sense base? Yes.
(A wheel should be bound with "Yes" everywhere).
3.
The Pure Sense Base Section
Conformity
14. Is the eye a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the eye sense base?
The eye sense base is both a sense base and the eye sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the eye sense base.
Is the ear a sense base?
Yes. Etc. The nose... The tongue... The body... matter... Sound... Odour... Flavour... Touch... The mind... Is mental phenomenon a sense base?
Yes.
Is a sense base the mind-object sense base?
The mind-object sense base is both a sense base and the mind-object sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the mind-object sense base.
Opposite
15. Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Setting aside eye, the remaining sense bases are not eye, but are sense bases. Setting aside eye and sense base, the remainder is neither eye nor sense base.
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not ear not a sense base?
Setting aside ear, etc. Setting aside nose, etc. Setting aside tongue, etc. nor sense base.
Is what is not a sense base not the tongue sense base? Yes.
Is what is not body not a sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the body sense base? Yes.
Is what is not matter not a sense base?
Setting aside matter, etc. Setting aside sound, etc. Setting aside odour, etc. Setting aside flavour, etc. Setting aside tangible object, etc. nor sense base. Is what is not a sense base not the touch sense base? Yes.
Is what is not mind not a sense base?
Setting aside mind, the remaining sense bases are not mind, but are sense bases. Setting aside mind and sense base, the remainder is neither mind nor sense base.
Is what is not a sense base not the mind sense base? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
4.
The Pure Sense Base Root Wheel Section
Conformity
16. Is the eye a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the ear sense base?
The ear sense base is both a sense base and the ear sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the ear sense base.
Is the eye a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the nose sense base? Etc. Is a sense base the mind-object sense base?
The mind-object sense base is both a sense base and the mind-object sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the mind-object sense base.
Is the ear a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the eye sense base? Etc. not the eye sense base... etc. Is a sense base the mind-object sense base? Etc. not the mind-object sense base.
Is the nose a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the eye sense base? Etc. Is a sense base the mind-object sense base? Etc. not the mind-object sense base... etc.
Is mental phenomenon a sense base? Yes.
Is a sense base the eye sense base? Etc. Is a sense base the mind sense base?
The mind sense base is both a sense base and the mind sense base. The remaining sense bases are not the mind sense base.
(A wheel should be bound)
Opposite
17. Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Setting aside eye, the remaining sense bases are not eye, but are sense bases. Setting aside eye and sense base, the remainder is neither eye nor sense base.
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base? Yes.
Is what is not eye not a sense base?
Setting aside eye, the remaining sense bases are not eye, but are sense bases. Setting aside eye and sense base, the remainder is neither eye nor sense base.
Is what is not a sense base not the nose sense base? Etc. Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base?
Yes.
Is what is not ear not a sense base?
Setting aside ear, etc. Setting aside nose, etc. Setting aside tongue, etc. nor sense base. Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Yes.
Is what is not body not a sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Yes. Etc. Is what is not a sense base not the mind-object sense base? Yes. Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the eye sense base? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not a sense base? Yes.
Is what is not a sense base not the ear sense base? Yes. Etc.
Is what is not a sense base not the mind sense base? Yes.
(A wheel should be bound)
The Section on Analytic Explanation of Description.
2.
The Section on Occurrence 1.
The Section on Arising
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
18. For whom the eye sense base arises, does the ear sense base arise for that one?
For those with eyes but without ears being reborn, for them the eye sense base arises, but the ear sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes and with ears being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the ear sense base arises.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those with ears but without eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with ears and with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those with eyes but without nose being reborn, for them the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes and with nose being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base arises.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those with nose but without eyes being reborn, for them the nose sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose and with eyes being reborn, for them both the nose sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those with material form but without eyes being reborn, for them the visible form sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those with consciousness but without eyes being reborn, for them the mind sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those without eyes being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arises and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
19. For whom the nose sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those with material form but without nose being reborn, for them the visible form sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base arises and the nose sense base arises.
For whom the nose sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those with consciousness but without nose being reborn, for them the mind sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind sense base arises and the nose sense base arises.
For whom the nose sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those without nose being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arises and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
20. For whom the visible form sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them the visible form sense base arises, but the mind sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form and with consciousness being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base arises and the mind sense base arises.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind sense base arises, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with consciousness and with material form being reborn, for them both the mind sense base arises and the visible form sense base arises.
For whom the visible form sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arises, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arises and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
21. For whom the mind sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arises, but the mind sense base does not arise for them. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arises and the mind sense base arises. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Conformity Place
22. Where the eye sense base arises, does the ear sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the ear sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise there? Yes.
Where the eye sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere of existence, there the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise there. In the sensual-sphere of existence, there both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base arises.
Or else, where the nose sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise there? Yes.
Where the eye sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the visible form sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the visible form sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the visible form sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
Where the eye sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the mind sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the mind sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the mind sense base arises and the eye sense base arises.
Where the eye sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm and in the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the mind-object sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the mind-object sense base arises and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
23. Where the nose sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the visible form sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere of existence, there the visible form sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise there. In the sensual-sphere of existence, there both the visible form sense base arises and the nose sense base arises.
(Where the nose sense base arises, there the mind sense base and the mind-object sense base are similar, there is no difference; but above, it should be known that there is an abridgement of the section.)
Where the nose sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base arises, does the nose sense base arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, there the mind-object sense base arises, but the nose sense base does not arise there. In the sensual-sphere of existence, there both the mind-object sense base arises and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
24. Where the visible form sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the visible form sense base arises, but the mind sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the visible form sense base arises and the mind sense base arises.
Or else, where the mind sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the mind sense base arises, but the visible form sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the mind sense base arises and the visible form sense base arises.
Where the visible form sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base arises, does the visible form sense base arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the mind-object sense base arises, but the visible form sense base does not arise there. In the five-aggregate constituent realm and in the non-percipient being realm, there both the mind-object sense base arises and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
25. Where the mind sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the mind-object sense base arises, but the mind sense base does not arise there. In the four-aggregate constituent realm and in the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the mind-object sense base arises and the mind sense base arises. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Conformity - Person - Place
26. For whom and where the eye sense base arises, does the ear sense base arise for that one there?
For those with eyes but without ears being reborn, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the ear sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes and with ears being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the ear sense base arises.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base arises, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those with ears but without eyes being reborn, for them there the ear sense base arises, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with ears and with eyes being reborn, for them there both the ear sense base arises and the eye sense base arises (abbreviated, similar to the 'for whom' section).
27. For whom and where the mind sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arises, does the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base arises, but the mind sense base does not arise for them there. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base arises and the mind sense base arises.
Negative Person
28. For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the ear sense base not arise for that one?
For those without eyes but with ears being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without eyes and without ears being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those without ears but with eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base does not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without ears and without eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base does not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those without eyes but with nose being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without eyes and without nose being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those without nose but with eyes being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without nose and without eyes being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those without eyes but with material form being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For those without eyes but with consciousness being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
29. For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those without nose but with material form being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For those without nose but with consciousness being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For those without nose being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
30. For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For immaterial beings being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the mind sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For immaterial beings being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
31. For whom the mind sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does arise for them. For all those passing away, for them both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
The Negative Section on Place
32. Where the eye sense base does not arise, does the ear sense base not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the ear sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise there? Yes.
Where the eye sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the nose sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere of existence, there the nose sense base does not arise, but the eye sense base does arise there. In the non-percipient being realm and in the immaterial-sphere of existence, there both the nose sense base does not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
Where the eye sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise there. In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
Or else, where the visible form sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise there? Yes.
Where the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does arise there. In the non-percipient being realm, there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not arise.
Or else, where the mind sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise there? Yes.
Where the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise there? There is not. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
33. Where the nose sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere of existence, there the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise there. In the immaterial-sphere of existence, there both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
Or else, where the visible form sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise there? Yes.
Where the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise there?
In the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does arise there. In the non-percipient being realm, there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not arise.
Or else, where the mind sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise there? Yes.
Where the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not arise there? There is not. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
34. Where the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the mind sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise there? It arises.
Where the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise there? There is not. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
35. Where the mind sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise there? It arises.
Or else, where the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise there? There is not. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative - Person - Place
36. For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, does the ear sense base not arise for that one there?
For those without eyes but with ears being reborn, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base does arise for them there. For all those passing away, and for those without eyes and without ears being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base does not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those without ears but with eyes being reborn, for them there the ear sense base does not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For all those passing away, and for those without ears and without eyes being reborn, for them there both the ear sense base does not arise and the eye sense base does not arise. Etc.
37. For whom and where the mind sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does arise for them there. For all those passing away, for them there both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
38. For whom the eye sense base arose, did the ear sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base arose, did the nose sense base arise for that one? Etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
39. For whom the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base arose, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, did the mind sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
40. Where the eye sense base arose... etc. (The 'where' section in the present, in the past, in the future, in the present-past, in the present-future, in the past-future, everywhere is similar; the name 'arises' and 'arose' should be made extra).
Conformity - Person - Place
41. For whom and where the eye sense base arose, did the ear sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the nose sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the eye sense base arose.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, did the mind sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the eye sense base arose.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the eye sense base arose. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
42. For whom and where the nose sense base arose, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base arose, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the nose sense base arose.
For whom and where the nose sense base arose, did the mind sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the nose sense base arose.
For whom and where the nose sense base arose, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the nose sense base arose. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
43. For whom and where the visible form sense base arose, did the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the mind sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the mind sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the visible form sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the visible form sense base arose.
For whom and where the visible form sense base arose, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the visible form sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the visible form sense base arose. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root).
44. For whom and where the mind sense base arose, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, did the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the mind sense base did not arise for them there. For four-aggregate constituent beings and five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the mind sense base arose. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative Person
45. For whom the eye sense base had not arisen, had the ear sense base not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one? There is not. (Abbreviated)
46. For whom the mind sense base had not arisen, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had not arisen, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one? There is not. Etc.
The Negative Section on Place
47. Where the eye sense base had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
48. For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, had the ear sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
49. For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
50. For whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the visible form sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the visible form sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
51. For whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there? Yes. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
52. For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the ear sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will arise (the mind sense base and the mind-object sense base for that one are similar, these two are indeed similar).
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the eye sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the eye sense base will arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
53. For whom the nose sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the visible form sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise.
For whom the nose sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
54. For whom the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the visible form sense base will arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root).
55. For whom the mind sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, will the mind sense base arise for that one? Yes. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Conformity Place
56. Where the eye sense base will arise... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
57. For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the ear sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the eye sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the eye sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the mind sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the eye sense base will arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
58. For whom and where the nose sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise.
For whom and where the nose sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the nose sense base will arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
59. For whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the visible form sense base will arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the visible form sense base will arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
60. For whom and where the mind sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For four-aggregate constituent beings and five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the mind sense base will arise. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative Person
61. For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the ear sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the eye sense base will not arise.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not arise?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence, for them both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
62. For whom the nose sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not arise?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
63. For whom the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not arise?
For those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those in their last existence, for them both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
64. For whom the mind sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one? Yes. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
The Negative Section on Place
65. Where the eye sense base will not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
66. For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the ear sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the eye sense base will not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
67. For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For beings in their last existence and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
68. For whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
69. For whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
70. For whom the eye sense base arises, did the ear sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base arose and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arose and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
71. For whom the nose sense base arises, does the visible form sense base... etc. the mind sense base... did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arose, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arose and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
72. For whom the visible form sense base arises, does the mind sense base... etc. did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arose, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arose and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
73. For whom the mind sense base arises, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base arose, does the mind sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base arose, but the mind sense base does not arise for them. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base arose and the mind sense base arises. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Conformity Place
74. Where the eye sense base arises, did the ear sense base arise there? Yes. Etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
75. For whom and where the eye sense base arises, did the ear sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the ear sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the ear sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the ear sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the ear sense base arose and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base arose and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the visible form sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the visible form sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, did the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the mind sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the mind sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the mind-object sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
76. For whom and where the nose sense base arises, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base arose, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, did the mind sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
77. For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, did the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the visible form sense base arises, but the mind sense base did not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the visible form sense base arises and the mind sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base arose, does the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the visible form sense base arises.
For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the visible form sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with material form being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base arises and the mind-object sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, does the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them there. For those with material form being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
78. For whom and where the mind sense base arises, did the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the mind sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base did not arise for them there. For the others with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base arises and the mind-object sense base arose.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base arose, does the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base arose, but the mind sense base does not arise for them there. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base arose and the mind sense base arises. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative Person
79. For whom the eye sense base does not arise, had the ear sense base not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? There is not.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... had the mind-object sense base not arisen? It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? There is not.
80. For whom the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... For whom the mind sense base does not arise, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the mind sense base not arise for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
81. Where the eye sense base does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
82. For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, had the ear sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the ear sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base had arisen for them there. For those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the visible form sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not arisen, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not arisen and the eye sense base does not arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
83. For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
84. For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the mind sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the mind sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base does not arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
85. For whom and where the mind sense base does not arise, had the mind-object sense base not arisen for that one there?
For all those passing away, for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base had arisen for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not arisen, does the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base does not arise. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
86. For whom the eye sense base arises, will the ear sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base arises, but the ear sense base will not arise for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the ear sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the nose sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the nose sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base arises, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the eye sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the mind sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the eye sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
87. For whom the nose sense base arises, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the nose sense base arises, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others with nose being reborn, for them both the nose sense base arises and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises.
For whom the nose sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them the nose sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them. For the others with nose being reborn, for them both the nose sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the mind sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises.
For whom the nose sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them the nose sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others with nose being reborn, for them both the nose sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
88. For whom the visible form sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the visible form sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them. For the others with material form being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base will arise, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form being reborn, for them both the mind sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arises.
For whom the visible form sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the visible form sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others with material form being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
89. For whom the mind sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the mind sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others with consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, does the mind sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will arise, but the mind sense base does not arise for them. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will arise and the mind sense base arises.
Conformity Place
90. Where the eye sense base arises... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
91. For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the ear sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the ear sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the ear sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the ear sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the ear sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
92. For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arises, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with nose being reborn, for them there both the nose sense base arises and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with nose being reborn, for them there both the nose sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with nose being reborn, for them there both the nose sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
93. For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the visible form sense base arises, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the visible form sense base arises and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, does the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arises.
For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with material form being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, does the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them there. For those with material form being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arises. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
94. For whom and where the mind sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them there the mind sense base arises, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the others with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base arises and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, does the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the mind sense base does not arise for them there. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the mind sense base arises. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative Person
95. For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the ear sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the ear sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the ear sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the visible form sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the mind sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
96. For whom the nose sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the visible form sense base will not arise and the nose sense base does not arise.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not arise?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the nose sense base does not arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
97. For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not arise?
For all those passing away, for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
98. For whom the mind sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the mind sense base does not arise. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
The Negative Section on Place
99. Where the eye sense base does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
100. For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the ear sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the ear sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the eye sense base does not arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
101. For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the nose sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the nose sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the nose sense base does not arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
102. For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base does not arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
103. For whom and where the mind sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, does the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base does not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the mind sense base does not arise. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
104. For whom the eye sense base arose, will the ear sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base arose, but the ear sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base arose and the ear sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will arise, did the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base arose, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base arose, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base arose and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base arose, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base arose, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base arose and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base arose, the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the eye sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise. Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
105. For whom the nose sense base arose, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base arose, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the nose sense base arose and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base arose, the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the nose sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the nose sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc. did it arise? Yes.
106. For whom the visible form sense base arose, the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the visible form sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
107. For whom the mind sense base arose, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence, for them the mind sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will arise, did the mind sense base arise for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
108. Where the eye sense base arose... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
109. For whom and where the eye sense base arose, will the ear sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the ear sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the ear sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will arise, did the eye sense base arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the nose sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the eye sense base arose.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the eye sense base arose.
For whom and where the eye sense base arose, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, did the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the eye sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the eye sense base arose. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
110. For whom and where the nose sense base arose, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arose, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the nose sense base arose and the visible form sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the nose sense base arose.
For whom and where the nose sense base arose, for that one there the mind sense base... etc. the mind-object sense base arise for that one?
For beings in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the nose sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, did the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the nose sense base did not arise for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the nose sense base arose. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
111. For whom and where the visible form sense base arose, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence among non-percipient beings in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the mind sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will arise, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arose.
For whom and where the visible form sense base arose, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the visible form sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, did the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the visible form sense base did not arise for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the visible form sense base arose. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
112. For whom and where the mind sense base arose, will the mind-object sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence, for them there the mind sense base arose, but the mind-object sense base will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base arose and the mind-object sense base will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will arise, did the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will arise, but the mind sense base did not arise for them there. For four-aggregate constituent beings and five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will arise and the mind sense base arose. (Mind Sense Base as Root)
Negative Person
113. For whom the eye sense base had not arisen, will the ear sense base not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
For whom the eye sense base had not arisen, the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... will the mind-object sense base not arise? There is not.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
114. For whom the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... For whom the mind sense base had not arisen, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one? There is not. Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
The Negative Section on Place
115. Where the eye sense base had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
116. For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, will the ear sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the ear sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base will not arise and the eye sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, will the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the eye sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base will not not arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the eye sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base will not not arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the eye sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not arisen, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base will not not arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the eye sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the eye sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the eye sense base had not arisen. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
117. For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the visible form sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the nose sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the nose sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not arisen, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the nose sense base not arisen for that one there?
For those in their last existence in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the nose sense base had not arisen. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
118. For whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base had not arisen, but the mind sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base had not arisen and the mind sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base had not arisen.
For whom and where the visible form sense base had not arisen, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the visible form sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base had not arisen. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
119. For whom and where the mind sense base had not arisen, will the mind-object sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base had not arisen, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind sense base had not arisen and the mind-object sense base will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not arise, had the mind sense base not arisen for that one there?
For beings in their last existence, for them there the mind-object sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not arise and the mind sense base had not arisen.
The Section on Arising.
2.
Occurrence 2.
The Section on Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
120. For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the ear sense base cease for that one?
For those with eyes but without ears passing away, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the ear sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes and with ears passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the ear sense base ceases.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base ceases, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those with ears but without eyes passing away, for them the ear sense base ceases, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with ears and with eyes passing away, for them both the ear sense base ceases and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those with eyes but without nose passing away, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes and with nose passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the nose sense base ceases.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base ceases, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those with nose but without eyes passing away, for them the nose sense base ceases, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose and with eyes passing away, for them both the nose sense base ceases and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those with material form but without eyes passing away, for them the visible form sense base ceases, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the visible form sense base ceases and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the mind sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base ceases, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those with consciousness but without eyes passing away, for them the mind sense base ceases, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the mind sense base ceases and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those without eyes passing away, for them the mind-object sense base ceases, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base ceases and the eye sense base ceases. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
121. For whom the nose sense base ceases, does the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those with material form but without nose passing away, for them the visible form sense base ceases, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose passing away, for them both the visible form sense base ceases and the nose sense base ceases.
For whom the nose sense base ceases, does the mind sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base ceases, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those with consciousness but without nose passing away, for them the mind sense base ceases, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose passing away, for them both the mind sense base ceases and the nose sense base ceases.
For whom the nose sense base ceases, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those without nose passing away, for them the mind-object sense base ceases, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base ceases and the nose sense base ceases. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
122. For whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the mind sense base cease for that one?
For those without consciousness passing away, for them the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind sense base does not cease for them. For those with material form and with consciousness passing away, for them both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind sense base ceases.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base ceases, does the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For immaterial beings passing away, for them the mind sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them. For those with material form and with consciousness passing away, for them both the mind sense base ceases and the visible form sense base ceases.
For whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For immaterial beings passing away, for them the mind-object sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them. For those with material form passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base ceases and the visible form sense base ceases.
123. For whom the mind sense base ceases, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the mind sense base cease for that one?
For those without consciousness passing away, for them the mind-object sense base ceases, but the mind sense base does not cease for them. For those with consciousness passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base ceases and the mind sense base ceases.
Conformity Place
124. Where the eye sense base ceases... etc. (In arising, in cessation, in arising-cessation, the 'where' section everywhere is similar).
Conformity - Person - Place
125. For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, does the ear sense base cease for that one there? Etc. the nose sense base... the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... does the mind-object sense base cease? (For whom and where, also similar, should be expanded).
Negative Person
126. For whom the eye sense base does not cease, does the ear sense base not cease for that one?
For those without eyes but with ears passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the ear sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without eyes and without ears passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the ear sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those without ears but with eyes passing away, for them the ear sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without ears and without eyes passing away, for them both the ear sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For those without eyes but with nose passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without eyes and without nose passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the nose sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those without nose but with eyes passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without nose and without eyes passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those without eyes but with material form passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For those without eyes but with consciousness passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those without eyes passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
127. For whom the nose sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those without nose but with material form passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For those without nose but with consciousness passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base does not cease, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those without nose passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
128. For whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For immaterial beings passing away, for them the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those without consciousness passing away, for them the mind sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease.
For whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For immaterial beings passing away, for them the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
129. For whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those without consciousness passing away, for them the mind sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For all those being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
130. Where the eye sense base does not cease, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
131. For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, does the ear sense base not cease for that one there? Etc. (For whom and where, also similar to the 'for whom' section).
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
132. For whom the eye sense base had ceased, did the ear sense base cease for that one?
Yes. (In the arising section, in the cessation section, in the arising-cessation section, the past questions in conformity and in reverse are similar.)
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
133. For whom the eye sense base will cease, will the ear sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, will the eye sense base cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will cease, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base will cease and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will cease, will the eye sense base cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, will the eye sense base cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the eye sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base will cease. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
134. For whom the nose sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base will cease.
For whom the nose sense base will cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base will cease. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
135. For whom the visible form sense base will cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base will cease.
136. For whom the mind sense base will cease, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the mind sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Conformity Place
137. Where the eye sense base will cease... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
138. For whom and where the eye sense base will cease, will the ear sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will cease, will the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings etc. For sensual-sphere beings etc.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, will the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings etc.
For whom and where the eye sense base will cease, will the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For immaterial beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings etc.
For whom and where the eye sense base will cease, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For non-percipient beings and immaterial beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings etc. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
139. For whom and where the nose sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For fine-material-sphere beings etc. For sensual-sphere beings etc.
For whom and where the nose sense base will cease, will the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings etc. For sensual-sphere beings etc.
For whom and where the nose sense base will cease, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings etc. For sensual-sphere beings etc. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
140. For whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings etc.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For immaterial beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings etc.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For immaterial beings etc. For five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings etc. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
141. For whom and where the mind sense base etc.? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where etc.?
For non-percipient beings etc. For four-aggregate constituent beings and five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base will cease. (As the future questions for whom and where have been expanded in the arising section, so they should be expanded in cessation also).
Negative Person
142. For whom the eye sense base will not cease, will the ear sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base will not cease.
For whom the eye sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the eye sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
143. For whom the nose sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
144. For whom the visible form sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the immaterial realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the visible form sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the visible form sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
145. For whom the mind sense base will not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
146. Where the eye sense base will not cease, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
147. For whom and where the eye sense base will not cease, will the ear sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base will not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not cease, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings and immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the eye sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not cease for that one there? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
148. For whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the mind sense base will cease for them there; for those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
149. For whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
150. For whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
151. For whom the eye sense base ceases, had the ear sense base ceased for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the ear sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the ear sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, does the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... etc. the mind sense base... etc. had the mind-object sense base ceased? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
152. For whom the nose sense base ceases, does the visible form sense base... etc. the mind sense base... etc. had the mind-object sense base ceased? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the nose sense base ceases.
153. For whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the mind sense base... etc. had the mind-object sense base ceased? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them. For those with material form passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base ceases.
154. For whom the mind sense base ceases, did the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the mind sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the mind sense base does not cease for them. For those with consciousness passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the mind sense base ceases.
Conformity Place
155. Where the eye sense base ceases... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
156. For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, did the ear sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the ear sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the ear sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the ear sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the ear sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, did the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the nose sense base had not ceased for them there. For those with eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the nose sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, did the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the visible form sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the visible form sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, did the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the mind sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the mind sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the mind sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, did the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the eye sense base ceases. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
157. For whom and where the nose sense base ceases, did the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had ceased, does the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base does not cease for them there. For those with nose passing away, for them there both the visible form sense base had ceased and the nose sense base ceases.
For whom and where the nose sense base ceases, did the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had ceased, does the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base does not cease for them there. For those with nose passing away, for them there both the mind sense base had ceased and the nose sense base ceases.
For whom and where the nose sense base ceases, did the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base does not cease for them there. For those with nose passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the nose sense base ceases. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
158. For whom and where the visible form sense base ceases, did the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had ceased, does the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the mind sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base ceases.
For whom and where the visible form sense base ceases, did the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with material form passing away, for them there both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them there. For those with material form passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base ceases. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
159. For whom and where the mind sense base ceases, did the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others with consciousness passing away, for them there both the mind sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had ceased, does the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base had ceased, but the mind sense base does not cease for them there. For those with consciousness passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base had ceased and the mind sense base ceases.
Negative Person
160. For whom the eye sense base does not cease, did the ear sense base not cease for that one? It had ceased.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one? There is not.
For whom the eye sense base... etc. nose sense base... etc. visible form sense base... etc. For whom the mind sense base does not cease, did the mind-object sense base not cease for that one? It had ceased.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base had not ceased, does the mind sense base not cease for that one? There is not.
The Negative Section on Place
161. Where the eye sense base does not cease, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
162. For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, did the ear sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the ear sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the ear sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the ear sense base had not ceased, but the eye sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base had not ceased and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, did the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the nose sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for them there the nose sense base had not ceased, but the eye sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not ceased and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, did the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the visible form sense base had not ceased, but the eye sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base had not ceased and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, did the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind sense base had not ceased, but the eye sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base had not ceased and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, did the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not ceased, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not ceased, but the eye sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not ceased and the eye sense base does not cease. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
163. For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, did the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base had not ceased, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, did the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not ceased, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, did the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not ceased, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
164. For whom and where the visible form sense base does not cease, did the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base had not ceased, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the mind sense base had not ceased, but the visible form sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the mind sense base had not ceased and the visible form sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the visible form sense base does not cease, did the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them there the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not ceased, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not ceased, but the visible form sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not ceased and the visible form sense base does not cease.
165. For whom and where the mind sense base does not cease, did the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them there the mind sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the mind sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base had not ceased, does the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there the mind-object sense base had not ceased, but the mind sense base does not not cease for them there. For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there both the mind-object sense base had not ceased and the mind sense base does not cease.
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
166. For whom the eye sense base ceases, will the ear sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the ear sense base will not cease for them. For the others with eyes passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the ear sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not cease for them. For those with eyes passing away, for them both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others with eyes passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base... etc.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, will the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them. For the others with eyes passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base... etc.
For whom the eye sense base ceases, for that one the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the eye sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others with eyes passing away, for them both the eye sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the eye sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them... etc. For those with eyes passing away, for them... etc.
167. For whom the nose sense base ceases, will the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them. For the others with nose passing away, for them both the nose sense base ceases and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, does the nose sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base does not cease for them. For those with nose passing away, for them both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base ceases.
For whom the nose sense base ceases, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them the nose sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others with nose passing away, for them both the nose sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.
168. For whom the visible form sense base ceases, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others with material form passing away, for them both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them. For those with material form passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base ceases.
169. For whom the mind sense base ceases, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them the mind sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others with consciousness passing away, for them both the mind sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the mind sense base cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base does not cease for them. For those with consciousness passing away, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base ceases.
Conformity Place
170. Where the eye sense base ceases... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
171. For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, will the ear sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the ear sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the ear sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will cease, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base ceases.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, will the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the nose sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base... etc. (As expanded in three ways regarding present and past, so this also should be expanded).
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base... etc.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the mind sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the mind sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base... etc.
For whom and where the eye sense base ceases, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with eyes passing away, for them there both the eye sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, does the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not cease for them there. For those with eyes passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base ceases. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
172. For whom and where the nose sense base ceases, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base ceases, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with nose passing away, for them there both the nose sense base ceases and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, does the nose sense base cease for that one there? For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there etc.
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there etc.
For whom and where the nose sense base ceases, for that one there the mind sense base etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with nose passing away, for them there both the nose sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base etc.
173. For whom and where the visible form sense base ceases, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind sense base will not cease for them there. For the others passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base... etc.
For whom and where the visible form sense base ceases, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with material form passing away, for them there both the visible form sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, does the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base does not cease for them there. For those with material form passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base ceases.
174. For whom and where the mind sense base ceases, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the mind sense base ceases, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the others with consciousness passing away, for them there both the mind sense base ceases and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, does the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without consciousness passing away, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base does not cease for them there. For those with consciousness passing away, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base ceases.
Negative Person
175. For whom the eye sense base does not cease, will the ear sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the ear sense base will cease for them. For those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the ear sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the ear sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base will cease for them. For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them. For those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the visible form sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the visible form sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom the eye sense base does not cease, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
176. For whom the nose sense base does not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the visible form sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the visible form sense base will not cease and the nose sense base does not cease.
For whom the nose sense base does not cease, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the nose sense base does not cease.
177. For whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease.
178. For whom the mind sense base does not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one? It will cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one? It ceases.
The Negative Section on Place
179. Where the eye sense base does not cease, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
180. For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, will the ear sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the ear sense base will cease for them there. For non-percipient beings and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the ear sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base ceases for them there. For non-percipient beings and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base will cease for them there. For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base ceases for them there. For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base ceases for them there. For immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those without eyes passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base ceases for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without eyes passing away, for them there the eye sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base ceases for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not cease. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
181. For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the nose sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those without nose being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the nose sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for those without nose passing away, for them there the nose sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base does cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the nose sense base does not cease. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
182. For whom and where the visible form sense base does not cease, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease.
For whom and where the visible form sense base does not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those being reborn, for immaterial beings passing away, for them there the visible form sense base does not cease, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base does not cease and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base does cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base does not cease. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
183. For whom and where the mind sense base does not cease, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there? It will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the mind sense base not cease for that one there? It ceases.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
184. For whom the eye sense base had ceased, will the ear sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base had ceased, but the ear sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base had ceased and the ear sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base had ceased, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base had ceased and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the eye sense base had ceased, will the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the eye sense base had ceased, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease. Or else, etc. Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
185. For whom the nose sense base had ceased, will the visible form sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the nose sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the nose sense base had ceased, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the nose sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
186. For whom the visible form sense base had ceased, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them the visible form sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
187. For whom the mind sense base had ceased, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna, for them the mind sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the mind sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
Conformity Place
188. Where the eye sense base had ceased... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
189. For whom and where the eye sense base had ceased, will the ear sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base had ceased, but the ear sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base had ceased and the ear sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base had ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had ceased, will the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the eye sense base had ceased, but the nose sense base will not cease for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the eye sense base had ceased and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base had ceased, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the eye sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the eye sense base had ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had ceased, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base had ceased, but the mind sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base had ceased and the mind sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will cease, but the eye sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the eye sense base had ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had ceased, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the eye sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, did the eye sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base had ceased. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
190. For whom and where the nose sense base had ceased, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base had ceased, but the visible form sense base will not cease for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the nose sense base had ceased and the visible form sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, did the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base had not ceased for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base had ceased.
For whom and where the nose sense base had ceased, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the nose sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, did the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the nose sense base had not ceased for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base had ceased. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
191. For whom and where the visible form sense base had ceased, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base had ceased, but the mind sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base had ceased and the mind sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will cease, did the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the visible form sense base had ceased.
For whom and where the visible form sense base had ceased, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the visible form sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, did the visible form sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base had not ceased for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base had ceased. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
192. For whom and where the mind sense base had ceased, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the mind sense base had ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base had ceased and the mind-object sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, did the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base had not ceased for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base had ceased.
Negative Person
193. For whom the eye sense base had not ceased, will the ear sense base not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not cease, had the eye sense base not ceased for that one? It had ceased.
For whom the eye sense base... etc. the nose sense base... the visible form sense base... For whom the mind sense base had not ceased, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, had the mind sense base not ceased for that one? It had ceased.
The Negative Section on Place
194. For whom the eye sense base had not ceased, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
195. For whom and where the eye sense base had not ceased, will the ear sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the eye sense base had not ceased, but the ear sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not ceased and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not cease, did the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the ear sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the ear sense base will not cease and the eye sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not ceased, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, did the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base had ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not ceased, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base had not ceased, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not ceased and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, did the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the eye sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not ceased, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not ceased, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base had not ceased and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, did the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the eye sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the eye sense base had not ceased, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base had not ceased, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base had not ceased and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, did the eye sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the eye sense base had not ceased. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
196. For whom and where the nose sense base had not ceased, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not ceased, but the visible form sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not ceased and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, did the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the visible form sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base did not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere of existence, for immaterial beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will not cease and the nose sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not ceased, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not ceased, but the mind sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base had not ceased and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, did the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base did not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the nose sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the nose sense base had not ceased, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base had not ceased, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base had not ceased and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, did the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the nose sense base did not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbāna in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the nose sense base had not ceased. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
197. For whom and where the visible form sense base had not ceased, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes from the immaterial realm, for them there the visible form sense base had not ceased, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base had not ceased and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, did the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base had not ceased.
For whom and where the visible form sense base had not ceased, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes from the immaterial realm, for them there the visible form sense base had not ceased, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the visible form sense base had not ceased and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, did the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base had ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for those attaining final nibbana in the immaterial-sphere of existence, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base had not ceased. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
198. For whom and where the mind sense base had not ceased, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base had not ceased, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind sense base had not ceased and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, did the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those attaining final nibbana, for them there the mind-object sense base will not cease, but the mind sense base had not not ceased for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the Pure Abodes, for them there both the mind-object sense base will not cease and the mind sense base had not ceased.
The Section on Cessation.
2.
Occurrence 3.
The Section on Arising and Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
199. For whom the eye sense base arises, does the ear sense base cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base ceases, does the eye sense base arise for that one? No.
For whom the eye sense base arises, does the nose sense base... etc. the visible form sense base... the mind sense base... does the mind-object sense base cease? No.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the eye sense base arise for that one? No... etc.
200. For whom the mind sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base ceases, does the mind sense base arise for that one? No.
Conformity Place
201. Where the eye sense base arises... etc. (The 'where' section with 'no' should not be done, the 'where' section should be done similar to the other 'where' sections, the 'where' section is similar in all three turns).
Conformity - Person - Place
202. For whom and where the eye sense base arises, does the ear sense base cease for that one there? No.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base ceases, does the eye sense base arise for that one there? No... etc.
203. For whom and where the mind sense base arises, does the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? No.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base ceases, does the mind sense base arise for that one there? No.
Negative Person
204. For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the ear sense base not cease for that one?
For those with ears passing away, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base does cease for them. For those without eyes being reborn, and for those without ears passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those with eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those without ears passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For those with nose passing away, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base does cease for them. For those without eyes being reborn, and for those without nose passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those with eyes being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those without nose passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those with material form passing away, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For those without eyes being reborn, and for immaterial beings passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those with eyes being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For immaterial beings passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For those with consciousness passing away, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For those without eyes being reborn, and for those without consciousness passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those with eyes being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those without consciousness passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For those without eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those with eyes being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base does not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those without eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base does not cease and the eye sense base does not arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
205. For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those with material form passing away, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base does cease for them. For those without nose being reborn, and for immaterial beings passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those with nose being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For immaterial beings passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base does not cease and the nose sense base does not arise.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For those with consciousness passing away, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For those without nose being reborn, and for those without consciousness passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those with nose being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For those without consciousness passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not cease and the nose sense base does not arise.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For those without nose being reborn, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one?
For those with nose being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base does not cease, but the nose sense base does arise for them. For those without nose being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base does not cease and the nose sense base does not arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
206. For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base not cease for that one?
For those with consciousness passing away, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base does cease for them. For immaterial beings being reborn and for those without consciousness passing away, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those with material form being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For those without consciousness passing away and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base does not arise.
For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For immaterial beings being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one?
For those with material form being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base does not cease, but the visible form sense base does arise for them. For immaterial beings being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base does not cease and the visible form sense base does not arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
207. For whom the mind sense base does not arise, does the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for them the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base does cease for them. For those without consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base does not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base does not cease, does the mind sense base not arise for that one?
For those with consciousness being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base does not cease, but the mind sense base does arise for them. For those without consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base does not cease and the mind sense base does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
208. Where the eye sense base does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
209. For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise... etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
210. For whom the eye sense base had arisen, did the ear sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had ceased, did the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes. Etc.
(The past questions in arising, in cessation, in arising-cessation, in conformity and in reverse are similar).
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
211. For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the ear sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base will arise and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the nose sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the nose sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom the eye sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
212. For whom the nose sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base will arise.
For whom the nose sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the nose sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base will arise.
213. For whom the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base will arise.
214. For whom the mind sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, will the mind sense base arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base will arise.
Conformity Place
215. Where the eye sense base will arise... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
216. For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the ear sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the eye sense base will arise, but the nose sense base will not cease for them there. For sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the eye sense base will arise and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the nose sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, will the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base will arise. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
217. For whom and where the nose sense base will arise, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base will arise.
For whom and where the nose sense base will arise, will the mind sense base for that one there... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, will the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the nose sense base will not arise for them there. For the other sensual-sphere beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base will arise. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
218. For whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will arise, but the mind sense base will not cease for them there. For five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the visible form sense base will arise and the mind sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the visible form sense base will arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, will the visible form sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base will not arise for them there. For the other five-aggregate constituent beings and non-percipient beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base will arise. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
219. For whom and where the mind sense base will arise, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, will the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For those in their last existence who are being reborn as non-percipient beings, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base will arise.
Negative Person
220. For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the ear sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base will not arise, but the ear sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base will not arise and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base will not arise and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base will arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base will not arise.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the eye sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
221. For whom the nose sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them being reborn, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base... etc.? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes.
222. For whom the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes.
223. For whom the mind sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn, for them the mind sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the mind sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
224. Where the eye sense base will not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
225. For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the ear sense base not cease for that one there?
For beings in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the ear sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For beings in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the nose sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for beings in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, will the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base will arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for beings in their last existence in the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base will not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For beings in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For beings in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For beings in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the eye sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
226. For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the nose sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
227. For whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, will the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base will not fail to arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base will not arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for immaterial beings, for them there the visible form sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the visible form sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where etc.? Yes. (Visible Form Sense Base as Root)
228. For whom and where the mind sense base will not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For those in their last existence being reborn as non-percipient beings, for them there the mind sense base will not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base will not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, will the mind sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
229. For whom the eye sense base arises, did the ear sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base had ceased, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base had ceased, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base had ceased and the eye sense base arises.
(As the present-past questions have been analysed in the arising section, so in the arising-cessation section also the present-past questions should be analysed both in conformity and in reverse.)
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
230. For whom the eye sense base arises, will the ear sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the nose sense base cease for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base will not cease for them. For the others with eyes being reborn, for them both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them the nose sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the nose sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the visible form sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them etc. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the visible form sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the mind sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them etc. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom the eye sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them etc. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
231. For whom the nose sense base arises, does the visible form sense base... etc. the mind sense base... will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the nose sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the nose sense base does not arise for them. For those with nose being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base arises.
232. For whom the visible form sense base arises, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base cease? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will cease, does the visible form sense base arise for that one?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them. For those with material form being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base arises.
233. For whom the mind sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base does not arise for them. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base arises.
Conformity Place
234. Where the eye sense base arises... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
235. For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the ear sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the ear sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the ear sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the nose sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the eye sense base arises, but the nose sense base will not cease for them there. For those with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the eye sense base arises and the nose sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the nose sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there both the nose sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the mind sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises.
For whom and where the eye sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, does the eye sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the eye sense base does not arise for them there. For those with eyes being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the eye sense base arises. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
236. For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the visible form sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will cease, does the nose sense base arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the visible form sense base will cease, but the nose sense base does not arise for them there. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the visible form sense base will cease and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the mind sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base etc.?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the mind sense base etc. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the nose sense base arises.
For whom and where the nose sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base etc.?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base etc. For those with nose being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the nose sense base arises. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
237. For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, will the mind sense base cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the visible form sense base arises, but for them there etc. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there etc.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base etc.?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there etc. For those being reborn in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for them there both the mind sense base will cease and the visible form sense base arises.
For whom and where the visible form sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base etc.?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the visible form sense base does not arise for them there. For those with material form being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the visible form sense base arises.
238. For whom and where the mind sense base arises, will the mind-object sense base cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will cease, does the mind sense base arise for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind-object sense base will cease, but the mind sense base does not arise for them there. For those with consciousness being reborn, for them there both the mind-object sense base will cease and the mind sense base arises.
Negative Person
239. For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the ear sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the nose sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the nose sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one?
For those in their last existence being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere of existence, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base... etc.? Yes.
For whom the eye sense base does not arise, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without eyes being reborn, for them the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not fail to cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
240. For whom the nose sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will not not cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the visible form sense base... etc.? Yes.
For whom the nose sense base does not arise, the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
241. For whom the visible form sense base does not arise, does the mind sense base... etc. will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for immaterial beings being reborn, for them the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them. For those attaining final nibbana, for them both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, the mind-object sense base... etc.? Yes.
242. For whom the mind sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, for those without consciousness being reborn, for them the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them. For those attaining final nibbāna, for them both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the mind sense base not arise for that one? Yes.
The Negative Section on Place
243. Where the eye sense base does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
244. For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the ear sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the ear sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the ear sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the ear sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the nose sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the nose sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the nose sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the nose sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the fine-material-sphere, for them there the nose sense base will not cease, but the eye sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the sensual-sphere of existence, for those passing away from the fine-material-sphere, for non-percipient beings, and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base will not cease and the eye sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm, without eyes, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for immaterial beings, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the eye sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without eyes being reborn, for them there the eye sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the eye sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the eye sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Eye Sense Base as Root)
245. For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the visible form sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the visible form sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana in the five-aggregate constituent realm and for immaterial beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the visible form sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the visible form sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the sensual-sphere of existence, without nose, being reborn in the sensual-sphere of existence, and for fine-material-sphere and immaterial-sphere beings, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana and for non-percipient beings, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
For whom and where the nose sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for those without nose being reborn, for them there the nose sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the nose sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the nose sense base not arise for that one there? Yes. (Nose Sense Base as Root)
246. For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, will the mind sense base not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the five-aggregate constituent realm to the immaterial realm, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind sense base will not cease, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the mind sense base will not cease, but the visible form sense base does arise for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the mind sense base will not cease and the visible form sense base does not arise.
For whom and where the visible form sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those passing away, and for immaterial beings being reborn, for them there the visible form sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the visible form sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the visible form sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
247. For whom and where the mind sense base does not arise, will the mind-object sense base not cease for that one there?
For all those passing away, for those without consciousness being reborn, for them there the mind sense base does not arise, but the mind-object sense base will not not cease for them there. For those attaining final nibbana, for them there both the mind sense base does not arise and the mind-object sense base will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the mind-object sense base will not cease, does the mind sense base not arise for that one there? Yes.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
248. For whom the eye sense base arose, will the ear sense base cease for that one?
For those attaining final nibbāna in the five-aggregate constituent realm, for those in their last existence in the immaterial-sphere of existence, and for those who, having been reborn in the immaterial realm, will attain final nibbāna, for them passing away, for them the eye sense base arose, but the ear sense base will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the eye sense base arose and the ear sense base will cease.
Or else, for whom the ear sense base will cease, did the eye sense base arise for that one? Yes.
(As in the cessation section the past-future questions have been analysed for 'for whom' also, for 'where' also, for 'for whom and where' also, in conformity also, in reverse also, so in the arising-cessation section also the past-future questions should be analysed.)
The Section on Arising and Cessation.
The Section on Occurrence is concluded.
3.
The Section on Full Understanding
1.
The Section on Present
249. Whoever fully understands the eye sense base, does he fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever fully understands the ear sense base, does he fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
Whoever does not fully understand the eye sense base, does he not fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever does not fully understand the ear sense base, does he not fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
2.
The Section on Past
250. Whoever fully understood the eye sense base, did he fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever fully understood the ear sense base, did he fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
Whoever did not fully understand the eye sense base, did he not fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever did not fully understand the ear sense base, did he not fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
3.
The Section on Future
251. Whoever will fully understand the eye sense base, will he fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the ear sense base, will he fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
Whoever will not fully understand the eye sense base, will he not fully understand the ear sense base? Yes.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the ear sense base, will he not fully understand the eye sense base? Yes.
4.
The Section on Present and Past
252. Whoever fully understands the eye sense base, did he fully understand the ear sense base? No.
Or else, whoever fully understood the ear sense base, does he fully understand the eye sense base? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the eye sense base, did he not fully understand the ear sense base?
A Worthy One does not fully understand the eye sense base, but it is not that he did not fully understand the ear sense base. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons do not fully understand the eye sense base and did not fully understand the ear sense base.
Or else, whoever did not fully understand the ear sense base, does he not fully understand the eye sense base?
The possessor of the highest path did not fully understand the ear sense base, but it is not that he does not fully understand the eye sense base. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons did not fully understand the ear sense base and do not fully understand the eye sense base.
5.
The Section on Present and Future
253. Whoever fully understands the eye sense base, will he fully understand the ear sense base? No.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the ear sense base, does he fully understand the eye sense base? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the eye sense base, will he not fully understand the ear sense base?
Those who will obtain the path, they do not fully understand the eye sense base, but it is not that they will not fully understand the ear sense base. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they do not fully understand the eye sense base and will not fully understand the ear sense base.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the ear sense base, does he not fully understand the eye sense base?
The possessor of the highest path will not fully understand the ear sense base, but it is not that he does not fully understand the eye sense base. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not fully understand the ear sense base and do not fully understand the eye sense base.
6.
The Section on Past and Future
254. Whoever fully understood the eye sense base, will he fully understand the ear sense base? No.
Or else, whoever will fully understand the ear sense base, did he fully understand the eye sense base? No.
Whoever did not fully understand the eye sense base, will he not fully understand the ear sense base?
Those who will obtain the path, they did not fully understand the eye sense base, but it is not that they will not fully understand the ear sense base. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they did not fully understand the eye sense base and will not fully understand the ear sense base.
Or else, whoever will not fully understand the ear sense base, did he not fully understand the eye sense base?
A Worthy One will not fully understand the ear sense base, but it is not that he did not fully understand the eye sense base. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not fully understand the ear sense base and did not fully understand the eye sense base.
The Section on Full Understanding.
The Pairs on Sense Bases is concluded.
Homage to the Blessed One, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Enlightened One
4.
Pairs on Elements
1.
The Description Section
Synopsis
1. Eighteen elements - eye-element, ear-element, nose element, tongue-element, body element, material element, sound element, odour element, flavour element, touch element, eye-consciousness element, ear-consciousness element, nose-consciousness element, tongue-consciousness element, body-consciousness element, mind-element, mind-consciousness element, element of phenomena.
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
2. Is eye the eye-element?
Is the eye-element eye?
Is ear the ear-element?
Is the ear-element ear? Etc.
Is eye-consciousness the eye-consciousness element?
Is the eye-consciousness element eye-consciousness? Etc.
Is mind the mind-element?
Is the mind-element mind?
Is mind-consciousness the mind-consciousness element?
Is the mind-consciousness element mind-consciousness?
Is mental phenomenon the element of phenomena?
Is the element of phenomena mental phenomenon?
Opposite
3. Is what is not eye not the eye-element?
Is what is not the eye-element not eye?
Is what is not ear not the ear-element?
Is what is not the ear-element not ear? Etc.
Is what is not eye-consciousness not the eye-consciousness element?
Is what is not the eye-consciousness element not eye-consciousness? Etc.
Is what is not mind not the mind-element?
Is what is not the mind-element not mind?
Is what is not mind-consciousness not the mind-consciousness element?
Is what is not the mind-consciousness element not mind-consciousness?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the element of phenomena?
Is what is not the element of phenomena not mental phenomenon?
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
4. Is eye the eye-element?
Is element the ear-element? Etc.
Is eye the eye-element?
Is element the element of phenomena?
(As a wheel was bound in the Sense Base Yamaka, so here a wheel should be bound.)
Opposite
5. Is what is not eye not the eye-element?
Is what is not element not the ear-element?
Is what is not eye not the eye-element?
Is what is not element not the nose element? Etc.
Is what is not eye not the eye-element?
Is what is not element not the element of phenomena? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the element of phenomena?
Is what is not element not the eye-element? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the element of phenomena?
Is what is not element not the mind-consciousness element? (A wheel should be bound).
3.
The Pure Element Section
Conformity
6. Is eye an element?
Is element eye?
Is ear an element?
Is element ear?
Is nose an element? Etc. Is tongue an element? Is body an element? Is matter an element? Is sound an element? Is odour an element? Is flavour an element? Is tangible object an element?
Is eye-consciousness an element?
Is element eye-consciousness?
Is ear-consciousness an element?
Is element ear-consciousness?
... Is nose-consciousness? Etc. Is tongue-consciousness? Is body-consciousness?
Is mind an element?
Is element mind?
Is mind-consciousness an element?
Is element mind-consciousness?
Is mental phenomenon an element?
Is element mental phenomenon?
Opposite
7. Is what is not eye not an element?
Is what is not element not eye?
Is what is not ear not an element?
Is what is not element not ear?
... Is what is not nose?... Is what is not tongue?... Is what is not body?... Is what is not matter? ... Is what is not sound?... Is what is not odour?... Is what is not flavour?... Is what is not tangible object?
Is what is not eye-consciousness not an element?
Is what is not element not eye-consciousness?
... Is what is not ear-consciousness?... Etc. Is what is not nose-consciousness?... Is what is not tongue-consciousness?
Is what is not body-consciousness not an element?
Is what is not element not body-consciousness?
Is what is not mind not an element?
Is what is not element not mind?
Is what is not mind-consciousness not an element?
Is what is not element not mind-consciousness?
Is what is not mental phenomenon not an element?
Is what is not element not mental phenomenon?
4.
The Pure Element Root-Wheel Section
Conformity
8. Is eye an element?
Is element ear? Etc.
Is eye an element?
Is element mental phenomenon? Etc.
Is mental phenomenon an element?
Is element eye? Etc.
Is mental phenomenon an element?
Is element mind-consciousness? (A wheel should be bound).
Opposite
9. Is what is not eye not an element?
Is what is not element not ear?
Is what is not eye not an element?
Is what is not element not nose? Etc.
Is what is not eye not an element?
Is what is not element not mental phenomenon? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not an element?
Is what is not element not eye? Etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not an element?
Is what is not element not mind-consciousness? (A wheel should be bound).
The Section on Synopsis of Description.
Exposition
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
10. Is eye the eye-element?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye-element. The eye-element is both eye and the eye-element.
Is the eye-element eye? Yes.
Is ear the ear-element?
The divine ear and the stream of craving are ear, not the ear-element. The ear-element is both ear and the ear-element.
Is the ear-element ear? Yes.
Is nose the nose element? Yes.
Is the nose element nose? Yes. (Tongue is similar to the nose element).
Is body the body element?
Setting aside the body element, the remaining body is not the body element. The body element is both body and the body element.
Is the body element body? Yes.
Is matter the material element?
Setting aside the material element, the remaining matter is not the material element. The material element is both matter and the material element.
Is the material element matter? Yes. (Sound is similar to nose).
Is odour the odour element?
The odour of morality, the odour of concentration, the odour of wisdom are odour, not the odour element. The odour element is both odour and the odour element.
Is the odour element odour? Yes.
Is flavour the flavour element?
The flavour of meaning, the flavour of the teaching, the flavour of liberation are flavour, not the flavour element. The flavour element is both flavour and the flavour element.
Is the flavour element flavour? Yes. (Tangible object is similar to nose.)
Is eye-consciousness the eye-consciousness element? Yes.
Is the eye-consciousness element eye-consciousness? Yes.
Ear-consciousness... etc. nose-consciousness... tongue-consciousness... body-consciousness...
Is mind the mind-element?
Setting aside the mind-element, the remaining mind is not the mind-element. The mind-element is both mind and the mind-element.
Is the mind-element mind? Yes.
Is mind-consciousness the mind-consciousness element? Yes.
Is the mind-consciousness element mind-consciousness? Yes.
Is mental phenomenon the element of phenomena?
Setting aside the element of phenomena, the remaining mental phenomenon is not the element of phenomena. The element of phenomena is both mental phenomenon and the element of phenomena.
Is the element of phenomena mental phenomenon? Yes.
Opposite
11. Is what is not eye not the eye-element? Yes.
Is what is not the eye-element not eye?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are not the eye-element, but are eye. Setting aside eye and the eye-element, the remainder is neither eye nor the eye-element.
Is what is not ear not the ear-element? Yes.
Is what is not the ear-element not ear?
The divine ear and the stream of craving are not the ear-element, but are ear. Setting aside ear and the ear-element, the remainder is neither ear nor the ear-element.
Is what is not nose not the nose element? Yes.
Is what is not the nose element not nose? Yes.
Is what is not tongue... (abbreviated, yes to both).
Is what is not body not the body element? Yes.
Is what is not the body element not body?
Setting aside the body element, the remainder is not the body element, but is body. Setting aside body and the body element, the remainder is neither body nor the body element.
Is what is not matter not the material element? Yes.
Is what is not the material element not matter?
Setting aside the material element, the remainder is not the material element, but is matter. Setting aside matter and the material element, the remainder is neither matter nor the material element.
Is what is not sound... etc. Is what is not odour not the odour element? Yes.
Is what is not the odour element not odour?
The odour of morality, the odour of concentration, the odour of wisdom are not the odour element, but are odour. Setting aside odour and the odour element, the remainder is neither odour nor the odour element.
Is what is not flavour not the flavour element? Yes.
Is what is not the flavour element not flavour?
The flavour of meaning, the flavour of the teaching, the flavour of liberation are not the flavour element, but are flavour. Setting aside flavour and the flavour element, the remainder is neither flavour nor the flavour element.
Not tangible object... etc. Is what is not eye-consciousness not the eye-consciousness element? Yes.
Is what is not the eye-consciousness element not eye-consciousness? Yes.
Not ear-consciousness... etc. not nose-consciousness... not tongue-consciousness... not body-consciousness...
Is what is not mind not the mind-element? Yes.
Is what is not the mind-element not mind?
Setting aside the mind-element, the remainder is not the mind-element, but is mind. Setting aside mind and the mind-element, the remainder is neither mind nor the mind-element.
Is what is not mind-consciousness not the mind-consciousness element? Yes.
Is what is not the mind-consciousness element not mind-consciousness? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not the element of phenomena? Yes.
Is what is not the element of phenomena not mental phenomenon?
Setting aside the element of phenomena, the remainder is not the element of phenomena, but is mental phenomenon. Setting aside mental phenomenon and the element of phenomena, the remainder is neither mental phenomenon nor the element of phenomena.
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
12. Is eye the eye-element?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye-element. The eye-element is both eye and the eye-element.
Is element the ear-element?
The ear-element is both element and the ear-element. The remaining elements are not the ear-element.
Is eye the eye-element?
The divine eye and the eye of wisdom are eye, not the eye-element. The eye-element is both eye and the eye-element. Is element the nose element? Etc. Is element the element of phenomena?
The element of phenomena is both element and the element of phenomena. The remaining elements are not the element of phenomena.
(As the description in the Sense Base Yamaka, so also the description in the Element Yamaka. A wheel should be bound).
Opposite
13. Is what is not eye not the eye-element? Yes.
Is what is not element not the ear-element? Yes.
Is what is not eye not the eye-element? Yes.
Is what is not element not the nose element? Etc. Is what is not element not the element of phenomena? Yes.
(A wheel should be bound, all yes to both and to the rest also).
3.
The Pure Element Section
Conformity
14. Is eye an element? Yes.
Is element the eye-element?
The eye-element is both element and the eye-element. The remaining elements are not the eye-element.
Is ear an element? Yes.
The nose... etc. The tongue... The body... matter... Sound... Odour... Flavour... Touch...
Is eye-consciousness an element? Yes.
Is element the eye-consciousness element?
The eye-consciousness element is both element and the eye-consciousness element. The remaining elements are not the eye-consciousness element. Ear-consciousness... etc. nose-consciousness... tongue-consciousness... body-consciousness...
Is mind an element? Yes.
Is element the mind-element?
The mind-element is both element and the mind-element. The remaining elements are not the mind-element.
Is mind-consciousness element? Yes.
Is element the mind-consciousness element?
The mind-consciousness element is both element and the mind-consciousness element. The remaining elements are not the mind-consciousness element.
Is mental phenomenon element? Yes.
Is element the element of phenomena?
The element of phenomena is both element and the element of phenomena. The remaining elements are not the element of phenomena.
Opposite
15. Is what is not eye not element?
Setting aside eye, the remaining elements are not eye, but are elements. Setting aside eye and element, the remainder is neither eye nor element.
Is what is not element not eye? Yes.
Is what is not ear not element?
Setting aside ear, etc. Setting aside nose, etc. Setting aside tongue, etc.
Is what is not body not element? Yes.
Is what is not element not body element? Yes.
Is what is not matter not element?
Setting aside matter, etc. Sound... Odour... Flavour... Tangible object... Eye-consciousness... etc. Setting aside mind-consciousness, etc.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not element? Yes.
Is what is not element not the element of phenomena? Yes.
4.
The Pure Element Root-Wheel Section
Conformity
16. Is eye an element? Yes.
Is element the ear-element?
The ear-element is both element and the ear-element. The remaining elements are not the ear-element.
Is eye an element? Yes.
Is element the nose element? Etc. Is element the element of phenomena?
The element of phenomena is both element and the element of phenomena. The remaining elements are not the element of phenomena. (A wheel should be bound).
Opposite
17. Is what is not eye not element?
Setting aside eye, the remaining elements are not the eye-element. Setting aside eye and element, the remainder is neither eye nor element.
Is what is not element not the ear-element? Yes.
Is what is not eye not element?
Setting aside eye, the remaining elements are not eye, but are elements. Setting aside eye and element, the remainder is neither eye nor element. Is what is not element not the nose element? Etc. Is what is not element not the element of phenomena? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not element? Yes.
Is what is not element not the eye-element? Yes.
Is what is not mental phenomenon not element? Yes.
Is what is not element not the ear-element? Etc. Is what is not element not the mind-consciousness element? Yes. (A wheel should be bound).
(As the description in the Sense Base Yamaka, so the description in the Element Yamaka should be expanded.)
The Section on Analytic Explanation of Description.
2.
The Section on Occurrence 1.
The Section on Arising
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
18. For whom the eye-element arises, does the ear-element arise for that one?
For those with eyes but without ears being reborn, for them the eye-element arises, but the ear-element does not arise for them. For those with eyes and with ears being reborn, for them both the eye-element arises and the ear-element arises.
Or else, for whom the ear-element arises, does the eye-element arise for that one?
For those with ears but without eyes being reborn, for them the ear-element arises, but the eye-element does not arise for them. For those with ears and with eyes being reborn, for them both the ear-element arises and the eye-element arises.
For whom the eye-element arises, does the nose element arise for that one?
For those with eyes but without nose being reborn, for them the eye-element arises, but the nose element does not arise for them. For those with eyes and with nose being reborn, for them both the eye-element arises and the nose element arises.
Or else, for whom the nose element arises, does the eye-element arise for that one?
For those with nose but without eyes being reborn, for them the nose element arises, but the eye-element does not arise for them. For those with nose and with eyes being reborn, for them both the nose element arises and the eye-element arises.
For whom the eye-element arises, does the material element arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the material element arises, does the eye-element arise for that one?
For those with material form but without eyes being reborn, for them the material element arises, but the eye-element does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the material element arises and the eye-element arises.
For whom the eye-element arises, does the mind-consciousness element arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the mind-consciousness element arises, does the eye-element arise for that one?
For those with consciousness but without eyes being reborn, for them the mind-consciousness element arises, but the eye-element does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the mind-consciousness element arises and the eye-element arises.
For whom the eye-element arises, does the element of phenomena arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the element of phenomena arises, does the eye-element arise for that one?
For those without eyes being reborn, for them the element of phenomena arises, but the eye-element does not arise for them. For those with eyes being reborn, for them both the element of phenomena arises and the eye-element arises.
(As the sense base pairs have been analysed, so the element pairs also should be analysed, it should be done similarly).
3.
The Section on Full Understanding
19. Whoever fully understands the eye-element, does he fully understand the ear-element? Yes. Etc. (The Pairs on Elements is complete by abbreviation).
The Pairs on Elements is concluded.
Homage to the Blessed One, the Worthy One, the Perfectly Enlightened One
5.
Pairs on Truths
1.
The Description Section
Synopsis
1. Four truths – the truth of suffering, the truth of origin, the truth of cessation, the truth of the path.
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
2. Is suffering the truth of suffering?
Is the truth of suffering suffering?
Is origin the truth of origin?
Is the truth of origin origin?
Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Is the truth of cessation cessation?
Is the path the truth of the path?
Is the truth of the path the path?
Opposite
3. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not the truth of suffering not suffering?
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?
Is what is not the truth of origin not origin?
Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not the truth of cessation not cessation?
Is what is not path not the truth of the path?
Is what is not the truth of the path not path?
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
4. Is suffering the truth of suffering?
Is truth the truth of origin?
Is suffering the truth of suffering?
Is truth the truth of cessation?
Is suffering the truth of suffering?
Is truth the truth of the path?
Is origin the truth of origin?
Is truth the truth of suffering?
Is origin the truth of origin?
Is truth the truth of cessation?
Is origin the truth of origin?
Is truth the truth of the path?
Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Is truth the truth of suffering?
Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Is truth the truth of origin?
Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Is truth the truth of the path?
Is the path the truth of the path?
Is truth the truth of suffering?
Is the path the truth of the path?
Is truth the truth of origin?
Is the path the truth of the path?
Is truth the truth of cessation?
Opposite
5. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?
Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin?
Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?
Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?
Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation?
Is what is not truth not the truth of the path?
Is what is not path not the truth of the path?
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering?
Is what is not path not the truth of the path?
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin?
Is what is not path not the truth of the path?
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation?
3.
The Pure Truth Section
Conformity
6. Is suffering truth?
Is truth suffering?
Is origin truth?
Is truth origin?
Is cessation truth?
Is truth cessation?
Is path truth?
Is truth path?
Opposite
7. Is what is not suffering not truth?
Is what is not truth not suffering?
Is what is not origin not truth?
Is what is not truth not origin?
Is what is not cessation not truth?
Is what is not truth not cessation?
Is what is not path not truth?
Is what is not truth not path?
4.
The Pure Truth Root Wheel Section
Conformity
8. Is suffering truth?
Is truth origin?
Is suffering truth?
Is truth cessation?
Is suffering truth?
Is truth path?
Is origin truth?
Is truth suffering? Etc. Is truth path?
Is cessation truth?
Is truth suffering? Etc. Is truth path?
Is path truth?
Is truth suffering?
Is path truth?
Is truth origin?
Is path truth?
Is truth cessation?
Opposite
9. Is what is not suffering not truth?
Is what is not truth not origin?
Is what is not suffering not truth?
Is what is not truth not cessation?
Is what is not suffering not truth?
Is what is not truth not path?
Is what is not origin not truth?
Is what is not truth not suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not path?
Is what is not cessation not truth?
Is what is not truth not suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not path?
Is what is not path not truth?
Is what is not truth not suffering?
Is what is not path not truth?
Is what is not truth not origin?
Is what is not path not truth?
Is what is not truth not cessation?
The Section on Synopsis of Description.
1.
The Description Section
Exposition
1.
The Section on Term Clarification
Conformity
10. Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is the truth of suffering suffering?
Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remaining truth of suffering is not suffering. Bodily pain and mental pain are both suffering and the truth of suffering.
Is origin the truth of origin?
Setting aside the truth of origin, the remaining origin is not the truth of origin. The truth of origin is both origin and the truth of origin.
Is the truth of origin origin? Yes.
Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remaining cessation is not the truth of cessation. The truth of cessation is both cessation and the truth of cessation.
Is the truth of cessation cessation? Yes.
Is path the truth of the path?
Setting aside the truth of the path, the remaining path is not the truth of the path. The truth of the path is both path and the truth of the path.
Is the truth of the path path? Yes.
Opposite
11. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.
Is what is not the truth of suffering not suffering? Yes.
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.
Is what is not the truth of origin not origin?
Setting aside the truth of origin, the remainder is not the truth of origin, but is origin. Setting aside origin and the truth of origin, the remainder is neither origin nor the truth of origin.
Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation? Yes.
Is what is not the truth of cessation not cessation?
Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remainder is not the truth of cessation, but is cessation. Setting aside cessation and the truth of cessation, the remainder is neither cessation nor the truth of cessation.
Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.
Is what is not the truth of the path not path?
Setting aside the truth of the path, the remainder is not the truth of the path, but is path. Setting aside path and the truth of the path, the remainder is neither path nor the truth of the path.
2.
The Section on Term Clarification Root Wheel
Conformity
12. Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is truth the truth of origin?
The truth of origin is both truth and the truth of origin. The remaining truths are not the truth of origin.
Is suffering the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?
The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.
13. Is origin the truth of origin?
Setting aside the truth of origin, the remaining origin is not the truth of origin. The truth of origin is both origin and the truth of origin. Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?
The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.
14. Is cessation the truth of cessation?
Setting aside the truth of cessation, the remaining cessation is not the truth of cessation. The truth of cessation is both cessation and the truth of cessation.
Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?
The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.
15. Is path the truth of the path?
Setting aside the truth of the path, the remaining path is not the truth of the path. The truth of the path is both path and the truth of the path.
Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation?
The truth of cessation is both truth and the truth of cessation. The remaining truths are not the truth of cessation.
Opposite
16. Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes.
Is what is not suffering not the truth of suffering?
Setting aside bodily pain and mental pain, the remainder is not suffering but is the truth of suffering. Setting aside suffering and the truth of suffering, the remainder is neither suffering nor the truth of suffering.
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.
17. Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is what is not origin not the truth of origin? Yes.
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.
18. Is what is not cessation not the truth of cessation? Yes.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.
19. Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is what is not path not the truth of the path? Yes.
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Yes.
3.
The Pure Truth Section
Conformity
20. Is suffering truth? Yes.
Is truth the truth of suffering?
The truth of suffering is both truth and the truth of suffering. The remaining truths are not the truth of suffering.
Is origin truth? Yes. Etc.
Is cessation truth? Yes. Etc.
Is path truth? Yes.
Is truth the truth of the path?
The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.
Opposite
21. Is what is not suffering not truth?
Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is what is not origin not truth?
Setting aside origin, etc. Setting aside cessation, etc.
Is what is not path not truth?
Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.
4.
The Pure Truth Root Wheel Section
Conformity
22. Is suffering truth? Yes.
Is truth the truth of origin?
The truth of origin is both truth and the truth of origin. The remaining truths are not the truth of origin.
Is suffering truth? Yes.
Is truth the truth of cessation? Etc. Is truth the truth of the path?
The truth of the path is both truth and the truth of the path. The remaining truths are not the truth of the path.
Is origin truth? Yes. Etc.
Is cessation truth? Yes. Etc.
Is path truth? Yes.
Is truth the truth of suffering? Etc. Is truth the truth of origin? Etc. Is truth the truth of cessation?
The truth of cessation is both truth and the truth of cessation. The remaining truths are not the truth of cessation.
Opposite
23. Is what is not suffering not truth?
Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes.
Is what is not suffering not truth?
Setting aside suffering, the remaining truths are not suffering, but are truths. Setting aside suffering and truth, the remainder is neither suffering nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Etc. Is what is not truth not the truth of the path? Yes.
24. Is what is not origin not truth?
Setting aside origin, the remaining truths are not origin, but are truths. Setting aside origin and truth, the remainder is neither origin nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Etc.
25. Is what is not cessation not truth?
Setting aside cessation, etc.
26. Is what is not path not truth?
Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of suffering? Yes.
Is what is not path not truth?
Setting aside path, the remaining truths are not path, but are truths. Setting aside path and truth, the remainder is neither path nor truth.
Is what is not truth not the truth of origin? Yes. Etc.
Is what is not truth not the truth of cessation? Yes.
The Section on Analytic Explanation of Description.
2.
The Section on Occurrence 1.
The Section on Arising
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
27. For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path does not arise for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the moment of arising of the path, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arises.
Or else, for whom the truth of path arises, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of path arises, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the moment of arising of the path, for them both the truth of path arises and the truth of suffering arises.
28. For whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path arise for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the truth of path arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one? No.
Conformity Place
29. Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not arise there. In the four-aggregate constituent realm and in the five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arises.
Or else, etc.? Yes.
Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path arise there?
In the realm of misery and in the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path does not arise there. In the remaining four-aggregate constituent realm and five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arises.
Or else, where the truth of path arises, does the truth of suffering arise there? Yes.
30. Where the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path arise there?
In the realm of misery, there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path does not arise there. In the remaining four-aggregate constituent realm and five-aggregate constituent realm, there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arises.
Or else, etc.? Yes.
Conformity - Person - Place
31. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin arise for that one there? Etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, should be expanded).
Negative Person
32. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
33. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the path, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
34. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise there? There is not.
Or else, where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises.
Where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise there? There is not.
Or else, where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise there? It arises.
35. Where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise there? Yes.
Or else, where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise there?
In the realm of misery, there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise there. In the non-percipient being realm, there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.
Negative - Person - Place
36. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from craving at the moment of arising, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one there?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the moment of arising of the path, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence of consciousness dissociated from path at the moment of arising, for them there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the fruition, for them there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
37. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the path, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does arise for them there. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path does not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path does not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them there. For all at the dissolution moment of consciousness, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path does not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
38. For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin arose, did the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of path arise for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path arose.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
39. For whom the truth of origin arose, did the truth of path arise for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path arose.
Or else, etc. did it arise? Yes.
Conformity Place
40. Where the truth of suffering arose... etc.
(The 'where' section also everywhere is similar. The difference in the text is similar to the 'where' section below).
Conformity - Person - Place
41. For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin arose.
Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.
For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of path arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.
42. For whom and where the truth of origin arose, did the truth of path arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second unwholesome consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom and where etc. did it arise? Yes.
Negative Person
43. For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, etc. had not arisen? There is not.
For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
44. For whom the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one? There is not.
Or else, etc. had not arisen? It had arisen.
The Negative Section on Place
45. Where the truth of suffering had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
46. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of suffering had not not arisen for them there. For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of suffering had not arisen.
For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering had not not arisen for them there. For those being reborn in the Pure Abodes, for them there the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering had not arisen.
47. For whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second unwholesome consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, and for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin had not arisen.
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
48. For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, etc. will arise? Yes.
49. For whom the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin will arise.
Conformity Place
50. Where the truth of suffering will arise... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
51. For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise... etc. will arise? Yes.
For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, will the truth of suffering arise for that one there? Yes.
52. For whom and where the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin will arise.
Negative Person
53. For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.
54. For whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?
Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
55. Where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
56. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.
For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering will not arise.
57. For whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
58. For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin arise for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of path arise for that one? For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom the truth of path arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path arose and the truth of suffering arises.
59. For whom the truth of origin arises, did the truth of path arise for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom the truth of path arose, does the truth of origin arise for that one?
For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of path arose, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path arose and the truth of origin arises.
Conformity Place
60. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc. (all similar cases apply here).
Conformity - Person - Place
61. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin arose.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of path arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path arose, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path arose, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path arose and the truth of suffering arises.
62. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, did the truth of path arise for that one there?
For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path did not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path arose.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path arose, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path arose, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path arose and the truth of origin arises.
Negative Person
63. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one?
It had arisen.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one? There is not.
For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one?
For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them. For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.
64. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one?
For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
65. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
66. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path had arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of suffering does not arise.
67. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, had the truth of path not arisen for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path had not not arisen for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path had not arisen.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not arisen, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path had not arisen, but the truth of origin does arise for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path had not arisen and the truth of origin does not arise.
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
68. For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arises.
69. For whom the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path arise for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will arise, does the truth of origin arise for that one?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arises.
Conformity Place
70. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc. (The 'where' section also should be done similar to the 'for whom and where' section).
Conformity - Person - Place
71. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arises.
72. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arises.
Negative Person
73. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
74. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin does arise for them. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
75. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
76. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of suffering does not arise.
77. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?
For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin does not fail to arise for them there. For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin does not arise.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
78. For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one? Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of path arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, etc. Yes.
79. For whom the truth of origin arose, will the truth of path arise for that one? For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, etc. Yes.
Conformity Place
80. Where the truth of suffering arose... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
81. For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of origin will not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of origin will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of suffering did not arise for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of suffering arose.
For whom and where the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering arose and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, did the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of suffering did not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of suffering arose.
82. For whom and where the truth of origin arose, will the truth of path arise for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of origin arose, but the truth of path will not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin arose and the truth of path will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will arise, did the truth of origin arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of path will arise, but the truth of origin did not arise for them there. For those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will arise and the truth of origin arose.
Negative Person
83. For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of origin not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
For whom the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
84. For whom the truth of origin had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one? It had arisen.
The Negative Section on Place
85. Where the truth of suffering had not arisen... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
86. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of origin not arise for that one there? It will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there? It had arisen.
For whom and where the truth of suffering had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one there? It will arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of suffering not arisen for that one there? It had arisen.
87. For whom and where the truth of origin had not arisen, will the truth of path not arise for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of origin had not arisen, but the truth of path will not fail to arise for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin had not arisen and the truth of path will not arise.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not arise, had the truth of origin not arisen for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of path will not arise, but the truth of origin had not not arisen for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not arise and the truth of origin had not arisen.
The Section on Arising.
2.
Occurrence 2.
The Section on Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
88. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of origin cease for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin ceases.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of suffering cease for that one? Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of path cease for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path does not cease for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path ceases.
Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of path ceases, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. In the five-aggregate constituent realm, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them both the truth of path ceases and the truth of suffering ceases.
89. For whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of origin cease for that one? No.
Conformity Place
90. Where the truth of suffering ceases, does the truth of origin cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering ceases... etc.
(The 'where' section in arising, in cessation, in arising-cessation is similar; there is no difference).
Conformity - Person - Place
91. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.
(The 'for whom and where' section is similar, should be expanded).
Negative Person
92. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, does the truth of path not cease for that one?
In the immaterial-sphere of existence, at the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path does not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for them the truth of path does not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
93. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path does not cease for them. For all at the moment of arising of consciousness, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving and dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path does not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. For all at the moment of arising of consciousness, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path and dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.
The Negative Section on Place
94. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
95. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, in the 'for whom and where' section also 'those attained to cessation' - this should not be done).
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
96. For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.
(As the past questions in the arising section have been analysed both in conformity and in reverse, so they should be analysed in the cessation section also; there is no difference.)
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
97. For whom the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
98. For whom the truth of origin will cease, will the truth of path cease for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin will cease.
Conformity Place
99. Where the truth of suffering will cease... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
100. For whom and where the truth of suffering will cease, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering will cease, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering will cease and the truth of origin will cease. Etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).
Negative Person
101. For whom the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.
For whom the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.
102. For whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?
Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.
The Negative Section on Place
103. Where the truth of suffering will not cease... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
104. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.
For whom and where the truth of suffering will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there? Yes.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of final consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not cease.
105. For whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
106. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, had the truth of origin ceased for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.
For whom the truth of suffering ceases, had the truth of path ceased for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path had ceased.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?
For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.
107. For whom the truth of origin ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path had ceased.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of origin cease for that one?
For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of origin ceases.
Conformity Place
108. Where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
109. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, did the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For the others, for those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.
For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those who have fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of suffering ceases.
110. For whom and where the truth of origin ceases, did the truth of path cease for that one there?
For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path had ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had ceased, does the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path had ceased, but the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those who have fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of path had ceased and the truth of origin ceases.
Negative Person
111. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one? It had ceased.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one? There is not.
For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one?
For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For those who have not fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.
112. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one?
For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.
Or else, for whom the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?
For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who have not fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of origin does not cease.
The Negative Section on Place
113. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
114. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes at the dissolution moment of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised passing away during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, and for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes at the moment of arising of rebirth consciousness, for those who have not fully realised being reborn during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of suffering does not cease.
115. For whom and where the truth of origin does not cease, did the truth of path not cease for that one there?
For those who have fully realised, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path had not ceased for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path had not ceased.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path had not ceased, does the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For those who have not fully realised, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of path had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for those who have not fully realised at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path had not ceased and the truth of origin does not cease.
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
116. For whom the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.
For whom the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.
117. For whom the truth of origin ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin ceases.
Conformity Place
118. Where the truth of suffering ceases... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
119. For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, for those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.
For whom and where the truth of suffering ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering ceases and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering ceases.
120. For whom and where the truth of origin ceases, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of origin ceases, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of origin ceases and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin ceases.
Negative Person
121. For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
For whom the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
122. For whom the truth of origin does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.
The Negative Section on Place
123. Where the truth of suffering does not cease... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
124. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of origin will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for them there both the truth of suffering does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of suffering does not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the dissolution moment of the highest path and of the fruition, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not cease.
125. For whom and where the truth of origin does not cease, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not cease, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin does not cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not cease.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
126. For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
127. For whom the truth of origin had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
Conformity Place
128. Where the truth of suffering had ceased... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
129. For whom and where the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of origin will not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, did the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering did not cease for them there. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering had ceased.
For whom and where the truth of suffering had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for non-percipient beings, for them there the truth of suffering had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of suffering had ceased and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, did the truth of suffering cease for that one there?
For those being reborn in the pure abode, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering did not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering had ceased.
130. For whom and where the truth of origin had ceased, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of origin had ceased, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of origin had ceased and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, did the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin had ceased.
Negative Person
131. For whom the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one? It had ceased.
For whom the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one? It had ceased.
132. For whom the truth of origin had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one? There is not.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, had the truth of origin not ceased for that one? It had ceased.
The Negative Section on Place
133. Where the truth of suffering had not ceased... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
134. For whom and where the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there? It will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one there? It had ceased.
For whom and where the truth of suffering had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one there? It will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of suffering not cease for that one there? It had ceased.
135. For whom and where the truth of origin had not ceased, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
For those in the Pure Abodes when the second consciousness is occurring, for them there the truth of origin had not ceased, but it is not that the truth of path will not cease for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin had not ceased and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, did the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for beings bound for the realm of misery, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but it is not that the truth of origin had not ceased for them there. For non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin had not ceased.
The Section on Cessation.
2.
Occurrence 3.
The Section on Arising and Cessation
(1) The Section on the Present
Conformity Person
136. For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin ceases, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? No.
For whom the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of suffering arise for that one? No.
137. For whom the truth of origin arises, does the truth of path cease for that one? No.
Or else, for whom the truth of path ceases, does the truth of origin arise for that one? No.
Conformity Place
138. Where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease there?
In the non-percipient being realm, there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin does not cease there. Etc.
(The 'where' section in the arising section, in the cessation section, in the arising-cessation section is similar; there is no difference).
Conformity - Person - Place
139. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, does the truth of origin cease for that one there? No.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).
Negative Person
140. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of origin not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of craving, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin does cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin does not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin does not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of origin does not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from craving, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin does not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, does the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path does cease for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path does not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path does not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
141. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, does the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the path, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path does cease for them. At the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving, at the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path does not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path does not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path does not cease, but the truth of origin does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of consciousness dissociated from path, at the moment of arising of consciousness dissociated from craving, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them both the truth of path does not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
142. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
143. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise... etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar, in the 'for whom and where' section also 'those attained to cessation' - this should not be done).
(2) The Section on the Past
Conformity Person
144. For whom the truth of suffering arose, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, etc. Yes.
(The past questions as analysed in the arising section, so in the arising-cessation section also should be analysed both in conformity and in reverse.)
(3) The Section on the Future
Conformity Person
145. For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
For whom the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of suffering will arise, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of suffering will arise and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, etc. Yes.
146. For whom the truth of origin will arise, will the truth of path cease for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of origin will arise, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of origin will arise and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, will the truth of origin arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin will not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin will arise.
Conformity Place
147. Where the truth of suffering will arise... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
148. For whom and where the truth of suffering will arise, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for non-percipient beings, for them there... etc. For the others, the four-aggregate constituent beings and the five-aggregate constituent beings, for them there... etc. (The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar).
Negative Person
149. For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
For the possessors of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering will not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering will not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering will not fail to arise for them. For the possessors of final consciousness, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering will not arise.
150. For whom the truth of origin will not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of origin will not arise and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, will the truth of origin not arise for that one?
Those worldlings who will not obtain the path, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin will not fail to arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
151. Where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.
Negative - Person - Place
152. For whom and where the truth of suffering will not arise... etc.
(The 'for whom' section and the 'for whom and where' section are similar; the truth of origin and the truth of path are different: at the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin will not arise).
(4) The Section on Present and Past
Conformity Person
153. For whom the truth of suffering arises, did the truth of origin cease for that one? Yes.
Or else, etc.
(The present-past questions in the arising section also, in the arising-cessation section also, for 'for whom' also, for 'where' also, for 'for whom and where' also, in conformity also, in reverse also, are similar; they should be analysed by one without confusion).
(5) The Section on Present and Future
Conformity Person
154. For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of origin will not cease for them. For the others, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of origin will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. For all those being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering arises.
155. For whom the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path cease for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not arise for them. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin arises.
Conformity Place
156. Where the truth of suffering arises... etc.
Conformity - Person - Place
157. For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of origin cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering etc. For the others being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there the truth of suffering etc.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of origin will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. For those being reborn in the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of origin will cease and the truth of suffering arises.
For whom and where the truth of suffering arises, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, and for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of suffering arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of suffering arises and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of suffering arise for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of suffering does not arise for them there. At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of suffering arises.
158. For whom and where the truth of origin arises, will the truth of path cease for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of origin arises, but the truth of path will not cease for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of origin arises and the truth of path will cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will cease, does the truth of origin arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of path will cease, but the truth of origin does not arise for them there. For those who will obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there both the truth of path will cease and the truth of origin arises.
Negative Person
159. For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one?
For all those passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for them the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for them both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for them both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one?
At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, and for those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
160. For whom the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for those attained to cessation, for non-percipient beings, for them the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one?
For those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin does arise for them. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.
The Negative Section on Place
161. Where the truth of suffering does not arise, etc.
Negative - Person - Place
162. For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of origin not cease for that one there?
For those passing away from the four-aggregate constituent realm or the five-aggregate constituent realm, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of origin will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of origin will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of origin will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, at the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the moment of arising of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of origin will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, at the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest path and of the fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of origin will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
For whom and where the truth of suffering does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
At the dissolution moment of that consciousness immediately after which they will obtain the highest path, and for those others who will obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the path and of the fruition, for them there the truth of suffering does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of suffering does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of suffering not arise for that one there?
At the moment of arising of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, being reborn, during the occurrence at the moment of arising of consciousness, for those being reborn in the non-percipient being realm, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of suffering does arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, at the dissolution moment of consciousness for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, passing away, during the occurrence at the dissolution moment of consciousness, in the immaterial-sphere of existence at the moment of arising of the highest fruition, for those passing away from the non-percipient being realm, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of suffering does not arise.
163. For whom and where the truth of origin does not arise, will the truth of path not cease for that one there?
At the moment of arising of the highest path, for those who immediately after this consciousness will obtain the highest path, and those others who will obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for them there the truth of origin does not arise, but the truth of path will not fail to cease for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of origin does not arise and the truth of path will not cease.
Or else, for whom and where the truth of path will not cease, does the truth of origin not arise for that one there?
For beings bound for the realm of misery and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the moment of arising of craving, for them there the truth of path will not cease, but the truth of origin does not fail to arise for them there. At the dissolution moment of the highest path, for Worthy Ones, for beings bound for the realm of misery, and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, at the dissolution moment of craving, when consciousness dissociated from craving is occurring, for non-percipient beings, for them there both the truth of path will not cease and the truth of origin does not arise.
(6) The Section on Past and Future
Conformity Person
164. For whom the truth of suffering arose, will the truth of origin cease for that one?
(As the past-future questions in the cessation section have been analysed both in conformity and in reverse, so in the arising-cessation section also they should be analysed by one without confusion).
The Section on Arising and Cessation.
The Section on Occurrence is concluded.
3.
The Section on Full Understanding
1.
The Section on Present
165. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, does he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever abandons the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? Yes.
Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, does he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.
2.
The Section on Past
166. Whoever fully understood the truth of suffering, did he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.
Whoever did not fully understand the truth of suffering, did he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.
3.
The Section on Future
167. Whoever will fully understand the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.
Whoever will not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin? Yes.
Or else, whoever etc.? Yes.
4.
The Section on Present and Past
168. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, did he abandon the truth of origin? No.
Or else, whoever abandoned the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, did he not abandon the truth of origin?
A Worthy One does not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that he did not abandon the truth of origin. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons do not fully understand the truth of suffering and did not abandon the truth of origin.
Or else, whoever did not abandon the truth of origin, does he not fully understand the truth of suffering?
The possessor of the highest path did not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he does not fully understand the truth of suffering. Setting aside the possessor of the highest path and the Worthy One, the remaining persons did not abandon the truth of origin and do not fully understand the truth of suffering.
5.
The Section on Present and Future
169. Whoever fully understands the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? No.
Or else, whoever will abandon the truth of origin, does he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.
Whoever does not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin?
Those who will obtain the path, they do not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that they will not abandon the truth of origin. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they do not fully understand the truth of suffering and will not abandon the truth of origin.
Or else, whoever will not abandon the truth of origin, does he not fully understand the truth of suffering?
The possessor of the highest path will not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he does not fully understand the truth of suffering. A Worthy One and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not abandon the truth of origin and do not fully understand the truth of suffering.
6.
The Section on Past and Future
170. Whoever fully understood the truth of suffering, will he abandon the truth of origin? No.
Or else, whoever will abandon the truth of origin, did he fully understand the truth of suffering? No.
Whoever did not fully understand the truth of suffering, will he not abandon the truth of origin?
Those who will obtain the path, they did not fully understand the truth of suffering, but it is not that they will not abandon the truth of origin. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they did not fully understand the truth of suffering and will not abandon the truth of origin.
Or else, whoever will not abandon the truth of origin, did he not fully understand the truth of suffering?
A Worthy One will not abandon the truth of origin, but it is not that he did not fully understand the truth of suffering. The possessor of the highest path and those worldlings who will not obtain the path, they will not abandon the truth of origin and did not fully understand the truth of suffering.
The Section on Full Understanding.
The Pairs on Truths is concluded.